• 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s not related because that choice is not what is happening. You don’t have one button that kills/saves rats and one that kills/saves a human.

    What is happening is that we have deemed it morall ok to medically experiment on non-human animals but not on humans.

    • KrankyKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s absolutely related. Animal testing has indirectly saved countless lives. I think you’re refusing to answer because it doesn’t help your argument.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        What argument? I haven’t made an argument, I want to know your position and what it is about humans that makes them more valuable than non-human animals.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You absolutely have made an argument and you continue to. You’re saying animal testing is morally indefensible despite any outcome it’s ever produced