cosmicrookie@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 år sidenEnvironmental protester halt the world championship in cycling... one of the best alternatives to fuel driven transportation....lemmy.worldimagemessage-square162linkfedilinkarrow-up1635arrow-down1130
arrow-up1505arrow-down1imageEnvironmental protester halt the world championship in cycling... one of the best alternatives to fuel driven transportation....lemmy.worldcosmicrookie@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 år sidenmessage-square162linkfedilink
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·2 år siden The event itself must have a lot carbon footprint. Same is true for almost every form of entertainment but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the truly big polluters.
minus-squarenal@lib.lgbtlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down3·2 år sidenSources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building.
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·2 år siden Sources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building. I always find it odd when people claim that something is by definition. Whose definition? Anyway, this event is promoting cycling and disrupting a cycling event does nothing to help further promoting any form of cycling.
Same is true for almost every form of entertainment but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the truly big polluters.
Sources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building.
I always find it odd when people claim that something is by definition. Whose definition?
Anyway, this event is promoting cycling and disrupting a cycling event does nothing to help further promoting any form of cycling.