data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f392b/f392b0a9526bfa64c58bd7b6811e90a9373af9ac" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f392b/f392b0a9526bfa64c58bd7b6811e90a9373af9ac" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f392b/f392b0a9526bfa64c58bd7b6811e90a9373af9ac" alt=""
I’ll note that 2.5°C of warming by 2100 is a significant improvement over the trajectory we were on a decade ago, even if still far from where we need to be
I’ll note that 2.5°C of warming by 2100 is a significant improvement over the trajectory we were on a decade ago, even if still far from where we need to be
You’re the one that mentioned now and what used to be.
Height. And I did not say the 60s or 70s either. I really don’t see this being productive anymore. (Well never was.)