return2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoSaved from her dead mother's womb, baby Sabreen was laid to rest in a mournful and sometimes angry funeralwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down121cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up193arrow-down1external-linkSaved from her dead mother's womb, baby Sabreen was laid to rest in a mournful and sometimes angry funeralwww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.world
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down15·8 months agoI read the article. That’s not in question. It’s just the head line is so confusing.
minus-squaresquirrelwithnut@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·8 months agoNo, it’s not?
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down13·edit-28 months agoIt doesn’t actually say that the baby died. It says the baby was saved then there was an angry funeral for the very same dead baby they saved! In the same same breath they say the baby is alive and dead at the same time! Stop being intentionally contrary. The headline is confusing.
minus-squareConfused_Emus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·8 months agohttps://www.hookedonphonics.com/
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·8 months agoThe headline is confusing. And my English is better than yours.
minus-squareConfused_Emus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·8 months agoApparently not. The headline didn’t confuse me at all.
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·8 months agoIrrelevant. The headline is objectively confusing. In the same breath that says the baby is alive and dead and that there were angry people at a funeral. I rewrote the title in a way that isn’t confusing in my comments. Please check it out my.
minus-squareConfused_Emus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 months agoI think you need to review objective vs subjective.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 months agoI didn’t have any trouble. Unfortunately. It was heartbreaking to read.
I read the article. That’s not in question. It’s just the head line is so confusing.
No, it’s not?
It doesn’t actually say that the baby died. It says the baby was saved then there was an angry funeral for the very same dead baby they saved!
In the same same breath they say the baby is alive and dead at the same time!
Stop being intentionally contrary. The headline is confusing.
https://www.hookedonphonics.com/
The headline is confusing. And my English is better than yours.
Apparently not. The headline didn’t confuse me at all.
Irrelevant. The headline is objectively confusing. In the same breath that says the baby is alive and dead and that there were angry people at a funeral.
I rewrote the title in a way that isn’t confusing in my comments. Please check it out my.
I think you need to review objective vs subjective.
I didn’t have any trouble. Unfortunately. It was heartbreaking to read.