• 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t need to go back in time by far. Moscow shootings. One or four well positioned snipers could save some lives there.

    Probably someone in a car driving over protesters, someone shooting an automatic weapon. Any person or humanoid unleashing high explosive fragmentation devices.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      In all these cases the teams would have to reaim outside of the crowd, and also unless they have been given permission to shoot at their discretion (oh please no) they need to call it in. Not really a great solution where the benefits outweigh the risks.

      And since no snipers saved the day in Moscow it does not really work as an example of snipers being used to defend a crowd. I also doubt with what we now know about the internal workings of the Russian federation I kinda doubt their snipers would have been fully capable.

      • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        And yet they are always present during such events so some people that aren’t random internet experts, like us, must see the benefit.

        Your yearning for fitting this into narrative got the better out of you this time around. I blame twitter.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Never had a twat account, sorry. I am more coming at this from a gun nuts thinking, Oh and the complete absence of any evidence of sniper teams being used to save a crowd. But maybe I just am not looking hard enough.