• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, the owner needs to do that to stay in business. You need to provide output valuable to the owners. The owner can decide whether you need to provide value to the customers or not.

    Example: Nepotism.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      example: nepotism

      Because unethical acts that are bad business practice are such a great example.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nepotism isn’t unethical. The owner of the company has every right to do what they want with their capital. There is nothing that says the owner must act in a rational or profit seeking way. A CEO must act in a profit seeking way, but that’s because he is accountable to the owner.

        It’s also not necessarily bad business practice. You seem to be suffering under the misconception that the world is a meritocracy, and the ‘best’ person for a job should get it. That’s not how any of this works in the real world.

        Regardless, you seem like a creative chap. You can come up with other examples of when a business owner might keep someone on payroll that wasn’t directly to extract value for the customer and instead to provide value for other reasons. I believe you can do it.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can think up all sorts of things, but that doesn’t make those things good business practice.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What’s “good”? Maximized growth? Maximized returns? Having your face on the TV the most times you can? Making a name for yourself in your town? When you’re the owner, you choose what ‘good’ is because it’s your business.

            And to my point, since the owner picks what is good, they will employ people whose output is valuable to the owner.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “good business practice” would be behaviors that are good for the long-term health of your business. These are objective, not subjective. You might want your face on the news but if it hurts, rather than helps, it’s poor business practice (just ask Papa John).

              • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re still assuming that long-term health of the business is the ‘good’. You may think that’s good, and when you’re a capitalist, you can choose that as your goal. It may even seem like the most obvious goal. But it’s not the only one. “Good business practice” is whatever achieves the goals of the owner of the business. Otherwise, it’s not a good business, because a business exists to serve the owner.

                Scenario: A business owner chooses to liquidate his entire company and shut down so he can retire. This is a good business decision, for him. But it is clearly not good for the long-term health of the business.