• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like “just start your own business!” I had a small business that did well enough that I was able to run it for 10 years and only stopped out of choice. I now have a relatively low-paying job with someone else and I am more financially secure now than I was during any of those 10 years.

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the same people that think we can simple jack up no-skill job wages to $15, 20, 30/hr think that all business owners are bazillionaires who can easily afford the more expensive wages.

      That was also the running theme in subs (on Reddit) when it came to landlords - they were all evil billionaires just looking to screw over their tenants.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope. I am one of those people. If you can’t afford to pay employees a livable wage, you shouldn’t be running a business. I had no employees, in part because I couldn’t afford to pay an assistant a wage I felt they deserved. People don’t deserve to suffer just so you can get The Burger Hole off the ground.

        • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one is talking about “suffering” FFS. But a no-skill job is still a no-skill job. Get a marketable skill and there is plenty of money out there.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Paying someone less money than they can afford to live on is allowing them to suffer at your business’ expense.

            So yes, we are talking about suffering.

            And there is no such thing as a ‘no-skill job.’

      • J Lou@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The whole role of a business owner is based on appropriating the positive and negative fruits of others’ labor. This is a violation of the moral foundation of property rights (getting the fruits of your labor). The workers should get the positive and negative fruits of their labor without any employers and run their company as a worker cooperative.

        Landlords are privatizing the products of nature which everyone has an equal claim to. Thus, landlords similarly inherently violate rights

          • J Lou@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The point is that in, for example, a car factory the employer owns the cars (positive) and makes the relevant contracts with the input suppliers (negative). The employees are jointly de facto responsible for using up the inputs to produce the cars. By the moral principle that legal responsibility should be assigned in accordance with de facto responsibility, the workers in the firm should jointly be assigned the legal claim to the produced cars and hold the liabilities to the input suppliers.

    • starclaude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      depends on what bussiness, and what country, in developing countries the salary for white collar and blue collar jobs are insanely low that it is basically slavery and you will earn like triple or more income if you have even the smallest bussiness like selling street food or door dash kind of job

      • camelCaseGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know where is that, but unless you don’t play by the rules usually being a business owner is worse. Usually developing countries have a myriad of taxes and labour laws that make having a business very difficult. So for you to have a business you either don’t go by the law (which is how successful “business owners” usually get there, by knowing someone or by cutting corners), you have to work an insane amount of hours (my dad used to work Monday to Monday, 10 hrs a day on a median), or you accept that you might need to declare bankruptcy in any given time.

    • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nobody said it’s easy to be independent. Stability is definitely not guaranteed when you have a small business

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When “just start your own business” is presented as a real viable alternative to a job with someone else, they are saying it’s easy. There’s nothing easy about it. And they don’t tell you very important things like the tax penalty you have to pay if you don’t file quarterly.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Life is not naturally easy- it is only because of the labor of others that life is anywhere near as comfortable as it is now.

          • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            We have the means to make a fair and equitable society with minimal crime and no hunger. We, as a society, choose not to. We choose the hard life for the sake of getting everything we worked for to ourselves at the risk of losing it all with one bad day. That’s not comfortable. The labour of all should benefit all so that everyone can have an easy and comfortable life.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            life can be easy for everyone if we all chip in a little, it’s the whole basis of society, we just can’t afford the hoarding aristocracy

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Serious question: do you think the “aristocracy” has like, vaults full of money? Like you think Jeff Bezos has billions of dollars sitting in his bank account? Or a literal vault?

              Because that is definitely not how rich people actually live. As a rule, they have very little liquidity as a percent of their net worth.

              • biddy@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                What does that have to do with anything? Just because the wealth is on paper doesn’t make it any less real.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It matters because people suggest that Bezos et al “hoard wealth” which is both untrue and impossible with the way their wealth is calculated.

                  • biddy@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It’s impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it.

          • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dude, stop. They don’t want to run a business, they want a guarantee of security, and by rights they are entitled to that. If you don’t agree, that’s your problem, but don’t come up on here thinking their complaints are a threat to your society thinking you have to change their way of thinking to quell it.

            We’re abandoning you whether you like it or not :P

              • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re defending a shitty evil economic system by defending the notion of small business as a meaningful alternative to work while ignoring the motivations of who you’re talking to. Doing that belies your motivations: you see him complaining as a threat to capitalism which you support, which is why you’re trying to convince him in the first place.

                I am telling you we’re going to abandon capitalism whether you like it or not, shutting down your primary goal of convincing people not to complain. I’m telling you emphatically we’re going to do a lot more than complain.

                It’s that simple

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No one is abandoning capitalism lol

                  Shit, formerly-communist countries embraced capitalism to have any sort of economy at all.

                  • J Lou@mastodon.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    This is a false dichotomy where the only options are capitalism and communism. In reality, there are other alternatives such as economic democracy that preserve markets but change the property relations of work

                  • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    The western world starting with millennials is, and you can see it everywhere. The system is collapsing under its own weight due to regulatory capture, climate collapse, and the destabilization of the U.S. And if that isn’t enough, I’ll likely do it my own damn self with my own life plans and goals.

                    No one wants your shitty dystopian hellscape. Take it and shove it.

            • Willer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There is no financial security. Anyone of you, even higher paid people, could go homeless any second and there is nothing you can do about it.