Colorado’s Democratic-controlled House on Sunday passed a bill that would ban the sale and transfer of semiautomatic firearms, a major step for the legislation after roughly the same bill was swiftly killed by Democrats last year.

The bill, which passed on a 35-27 vote, is now on its way to the Democratic-led state Senate. If it passes there, it could bring Colorado in line with 10 other states — including California, New York and Illinois — that have prohibitions on semiautomatic guns.

But even in a state plagued by some of the nation’s worst mass shootings, such legislation faces headwinds.

Colorado’s political history is purple, shifting blue only recently. The bill’s chances of success in the state Senate are lower than they were in the House, where Democrats have a 46-19 majority and a bigger far-left flank. Gov. Jared Polis, also a Democrat, has indicated his wariness over such a ban.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Conservatives are demanding the widespread oppression and even slaughter of our nation’s most vulnerable groups and the best we can come up with is “let’s disarm ourselves”. FFS

    Why not outlaw far-right ideologies like nazism? The conservatives would oppose that too, but it’s something all the normal people can agree on.

    • histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      While not opposed to the last statement it would be a terrible idea in the real world with corrupt government

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      If the government ever decides to take up arms against us, we are already screwed even with the massive oversupply of civilian weapons of war.

      • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think you’re missing the hyperbole in their statement. They’re suggesting they’re both misguided ideas.
        We could also argue, but the 2nd Amendment protects the 1st.