Is this really true?
What do you guys on Lemmy say? Most of us are tech people so we are more used to being alone with our thoughts perhaps.
Is this really true?
What do you guys on Lemmy say? Most of us are tech people so we are more used to being alone with our thoughts perhaps.
True, the article does specifically say people spent time doing nothing, and just thinking.
But this shocks me:
Really a wtf moment for me. I take from this that most people think it’s painful to meditate as well, because that’s reflecting on your thoughts.
I may be looking at it wrong but there’s an odd flaw to me in the premise. I view “pay money to avoid being shocked” as something that is happening to you, out of your control. Pressing the button, regardless of the outcome, is something you are choosing to do and is most likely a result of curiosity and bordem.
I think a better approach would have been “if you push this button, the simulation is over and you loose”, and then see what people do.
Also, I think most people are curious. It’s not often you get a chance to electrically shock yourself in a safe environment where you know you won’t be injured.
This headline makes a ton of assumptions, namely that the ability to feel boredom means that you hate being alone with your thoughts. Of course people who are stuck in a boring ass experimentation room with no stimuli are willing to try out a minor shock. I wouldn’t be surprised if most people would even consider it a fun experience. I know I’ve thought about playing with tasers before.
Something like “think about your past and explain how you feel, or press this button when you want to end the experiment early at the cost of a shock” would at least be a relevant premise. This is just another benign experiment turned into doomer clickbait, and I wouldn’t let it paint my worldview.
Man, I love getting shocked anyway, so this wouldn’t apply to me.
Username checks out