cross-posted from: https://linux.community/post/767456

I read posts about people quitting jobs because they’re boring or there is not much to do and I don’t get it: what’s wrong with being paid for doing nothing or not much at all?

Examples I can think of: being paid to be present but only working 30 minutes to 2 hours every 8 hours, or a job where you have to work 5 minutes every 30 minutes.

What’s wrong with reading a book, writing poetry or a novel, exercising, playing with the smartphone… and going home to enjoy your hobbies fully rested?

Am I missing something?

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    3·
    9 months ago

    I actually like my job. It’s meaningful and fulfilling.

    But I don’t get paid by the hour, I get paid by the amount of work I do. If it’s slow but I’m still required to be there, that shows that my employer doesn’t respect my time and doesn’t prioritize my income, and that’s offensive to me.

    Reading a book or dicking around on a phone goes against professional standards; even if it wouldn’t endanger my position I still wouldn’t do it. I want to work when I’m getting paid and get paid when I’m working, and make the most amount of money in the fewest number of hours so I can go home to be with my family.