If I understand Lemmy correctly, you can create duplicate communities on different instances. Isn’t this kinda counter productive because this may lead to less user interaction in those communities, because the user base gets split up between competing communities.

Is there a way to fight this division of the (small) userbase or is this effect even desired because it leads to more tight knit communities on the different instances?

    • Flashback956@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      ‘Stop asking this’ is not a really helpful thing to say. We have a lot of new users, including myself, and everybody is figuring out how Lemmy works. Redundant questions will occur and lets answer those in a respectful manner.

  • Squarg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d rather have multiple small communities than monolithic ones in most cases personally, that and it avoids the reddit problem of being forced to use a subreddit despite bad/creepy mods cause you can just make your own version in another instance

  • Ghost_Seeker69@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think this is desired. Lemme give my case. I think r/historymemes is absolutely flooded with racism, tankies and neo-nazis, and perhaps more than the rest, colonial apologia. Reddit being centralised, I can’t create another r/historymemes.

    Say we have a c/historymemes in some instance. The same racism and shit happens. No problem, I can look for a new c/historymemes on some other instance that is better moderated in regards to those problems.

  • softhat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I suspect it doesn’t really matter - users can see all of the communities across all of the instances when they search, and they can choose which ones are of interest to them.

    • Kasrean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      it matters a lot. if something is happening you want a quick overview of big discussion and not jump between a bunch of 10 small discussion rooms.

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yea, it’s an endless debate lately.

    Just subscribe to everything, and use your judgment where to post if you post. We can already see some clear bias towards the largest ones so it’s possible the small clones will be left behind.

    Or not and dupes will remain. Wait and sew after things settle down a bit.

  • Kresten
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They aren’t competing. As a user you should strive to follow ALL the comms with a similar topic, why limit yourself to the currently most popular one?

  • semibreve42@lemmy.dupper.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s a valid question. I think there is value in allowing separate communities, but it makes discovery harder.

    It would be nice to see a way of creating meta lists with one click signup functionality, so curated lists can be created.

    And/or the ability for communities to be able to link perhaps? So they become functionally one community, but with the ability to split remaining in the individual admins control.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There were duplicate communities all over Reddit too, as long as he didn’t have exactly the same name there were lots and lots of subs that had more or less the same content with overlaps of subscribers. Whenever those duplicates eventually one will pull ahead and most people will be active there.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Duplication happens on Reddit too. It’s not intrinsically bad and has some good aspects.

    Community diversity can allow for diversity in moderation, sub-culture, vibes etc.

    I think a good balance can be reached here on the #threadiverse/#fediverse (ie, with decentralisation).

    The real question isn’t whether it will be good/bad … it’s what we can do to make it as good as possible. The key issues are around searching and surfacing communities. The lemmy software can get better in this regard. Some basic third party tools like what feddit.de have made can also help.

    • Parsley@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think critical mass is needed for certain communities, and user splitting is bad for that.

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the early days during growth, yes I think you’re right. Adds to the frustration of people learning about federation and all that to.

  • Modal@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Users who are looking for larger communities can just dogpile whatever is popular and users who aren’t will find something that fits them better just as they always have. I think some people do struggle with not having the massive fire hose they are used to though but everything starts somewhere; it never was going to be everything to everyone all at once. I’m personally finding not being lost in a sea of noise to be more engaging.

  • godless@latte.isnot.coffee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why fight it? If they want 3 different asklemmy instances, let them. Eventually users will flock to the most active one, or there will be parallel ones. Then it’s on you to either join all or stick to whichever one you feel most welcome at.