This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

  • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Remember: Pretty much every Lemmy instance is run by volunteers that don’t have legal departments

    One lawsuit can shut them down.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Never understood people who don’t get this.

      As a person who is part of open source communities, on various chairs and donates, the money is extremely slim, and the people involved just want to build cool things.

      We are busy trying to keep the lights on for hundreds of thousands of people can enjoy this service. And if a small group of troublemakers force us to get a strong legal threat, we aren’t risking the the project’s survival for them.

      Especially when we don’t know the troublemakers, don’t have any connection with them, they don’t contribute to the platform, etc.