So I’ve recently been trying to use the term “2SLGBTQQIA+” over “LGBTQ” as it seems more inclusive, and includes first nation peoples beliefs on sexuality and gender, as well as including and differentiating “queer” from “questioning”. It’s not perfect (still combines A for ally and A for Asexual) but I think ally could just be included in the “+” portion. Regardless, It seems that people unfamiliar with this term just think I’m being a smart ass or a bigot. When truly I want to know what the limits of what “the community” feel is appropriate. Thank you to anyone who can shed some light on this for me.

  • As someone who is part of the LGBT group, I personally think it’s getting ridiculous that we just keep adding letters and things to an already ineloquent shortening. We need a new name that just includes all people intrinsically in the name.

    How about… Human?

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like “person” just in case we need to include non-human lifeforms at some point.

      We could be invaded by an advanced alien species, or cephalopods might be more sentient than we realise, you never know!