kinther@lemmy.world to Space@lemmy.world · 9 months agoNew research suggests that our universe has no dark matterphys.orgexternal-linkmessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1236arrow-down119
arrow-up1217arrow-down1external-linkNew research suggests that our universe has no dark matterphys.orgkinther@lemmy.world to Space@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squareDaft_ish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·edit-29 months agoThese type of comments always throw me through a loop. Scientist: Makes hypothesis, does analysis, writes paper, and presents work for other academics to review. Lemmy poster: Logs into lemmy. Posts “i think not mr scientist”. Recieves upvotes. While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings. It’s fine if you have knowledge on this particular subject but it kinda seems like you’re just throwing shade.
minus-squareacetanilide@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·9 months agoI get what you’re saying, but peer review isn’t exactly all that rigorous either
minus-squareDaft_ish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-29 months agoThey meet the bare minimum of at least being a peer in their field of research.
minus-squareEndward23@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months ago While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings. Thats not what the posting claimed to be. You missunderstand. Either intentionally or just as a fact.
These type of comments always throw me through a loop.
Scientist:
Makes hypothesis, does analysis, writes paper, and presents work for other academics to review.
Lemmy poster:
Logs into lemmy. Posts “i think not mr scientist”. Recieves upvotes.
While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings.
It’s fine if you have knowledge on this particular subject but it kinda seems like you’re just throwing shade.
I get what you’re saying, but peer review isn’t exactly all that rigorous either
They meet the bare minimum of at least being a peer in their field of research.
Thats not what the posting claimed to be. You missunderstand. Either intentionally or just as a fact.