• Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    226
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’re telling me the company that once had ads for T-Mobile and Volkswagen and now almost exclusively has ads where random bots with NFT photos advertise ChatGPT ‘services’ isn’t doing well financially??

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s important to note that “doing well financially” isn’t just revenue and user count, it’s also expenditures. If Twitter has managed to cut costs by more than whatever its income has dropped by then that could well be a good outcome for it, I’ve heard it wasn’t profitable when Musk took it over.

      It’s kind of ironic how big companies are frequently criticized for fixating on “endless growth” and “line goes up”, and then when a company or organization sheds that it also looks bad.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There’s so much wrong with your understanding here…so I’ll just point out that you’re talking about Twitter as if it’s still a public company, it’s not.

        Also, Twitter was never profitable, and it was likely never going to be profitable. But there’s a big difference between their losses and projections before Musk, and after.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          9 months ago

          But there’s a big difference between their losses and projections before Musk, and after.

          Which are?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If “lines goes up” meant things get better for the customers, the employees, and the world in general, then people would be cheering it on. Usually it means it gets worse for at LEAST one of the three, and sometimes all 3.

        Here, “line goes down” is following Twitter getting worse for the customers, the users, the employees, and the world in general. So people will cheer as it crashes.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Twitter has 1.3 Billion / in interest payments alone as it took on $13,000,000,000 in debt for the honor of being bought out by Elon Musk.

        The owners of that debt have been quaking in their boots all last year. As Bankruptcy proceedings would make them the new owner of Twitter.

        Note that Twitter made $5 Billion revenue on its best year, and that’s likely halfed or worse.

        EDIT: $5 Billion revenue on its best year. Far less today and you still have all the OTHER costs going on. I’m sure Elon will prop up Twitter with Tesla ads or something but Twitter cannot stand by itself anymore.

      • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I thought Twitter’s infrastructure was going to collapse within weeks after Musk made all those cuts and changes. I was obviously wrong because Twitter’s infrastructure didn’t collapse. I’m not speaking to the user experience on Twitter but from a purely infrastructure perspective, Musk was right and I was wrong.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Uh-oh, you said something positive about Musk. I only said “maybe he’s not as bad as it seems” and look where that got me.