nifty@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 months agoStop using floatslemmy.worldimagemessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up1785arrow-down135
arrow-up1750arrow-down1imageStop using floatslemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 months agomessage-square84fedilink
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoWouldn’t noise in the circuit mean it’d only be reliable to certain level of precision, anyway?
minus-squareChadus_Maximus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 months agoI mean, every irrational number used in computation is reliable to a certain level of precision. Just because the current (heh) methods aren’t precise enough doesn’t mean they’ll never be.
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoYou can always increase the precision of a computation, analog signals are limited by quantum physics.
Wouldn’t noise in the circuit mean it’d only be reliable to certain level of precision, anyway?
I mean, every irrational number used in computation is reliable to a certain level of precision. Just because the current (heh) methods aren’t precise enough doesn’t mean they’ll never be.
You can always increase the precision of a computation, analog signals are limited by quantum physics.