• EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    224
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    There is no active threat to the community

    Except from the COPS WHO KEEP FUCKING SHOOTING EVERYONE YOU STUPID CUNTS

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m gonna go with: don’t send cops on welfare checks. Send somebody competent to respond to mental health challenges, preferably someone not wearing a police uniform (after all, at this point a lot of folks think “unaccountable killer” when they see that uniform and there’s honestly reason for that).

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Calling the police for a wellness check is just legalized swatting…

    • Quereller@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Send somebody competent - are you sure there are enough competent people willing to this without protection?

      • Fermion@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        In my experience, social worker programs are only understaffed because they are severely underfunded.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          And we cycle back to “defund the police” being a bad slogan when we want to direct some of that law enforcement funding to support personal welfare

          • Fermion@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Maybe they should have borrowed corporate lingo to call for right-sizing police, or restructure community resources.

            “Defund the police” is such obviously bad marketing that it makes you wonder if the people who coined the phrase were trying to help or hinder reform efforts.

  • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The officer involved in the shooting has been placed on administrative leave, state police said.

    They need to start keeping then in jail cells like they do with everyone else whi commits a homicide

    • Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      That would have to be negotiated in the Police Union contracts. Same reason they can’t fire pedo teachers immediately, they are contractually obligated to keep paying them until they are investigated or found guilty.

      Most of these cops “retire” to end the internal investigation and keep their benefits, then decide to “unretire”, and get hired in the next town with a clean record.

      The police have one of the strongest unions in America, and almost no one bats an eye. But let Starbucks employees try to unionize and you’ll hear how greedy and corrupt unions are.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Fuck that. State or federal police should be arresting them that day. The local cops bargaining only matters because we allow it.

      • saintshenanigans@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most of these cops “retire” to end the internal investigation and keep their benefits, then decide to “unretire”, and get hired in the next town with a clean record.

        This is honestly the only real problem imo. I get sometimes it’s a pretty obvious case, but we do still have due process and they deserve their time in court, no matter how shit they are.

        If they couldn’t investigate themselves and the investigations didn’t just end when they quit, we’d be in a much better place.

  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ll say it again and again, before you call the cops for anything, you need to remember what you’re actually doing. You are willingly inviting an armed person, who will not lose a fight or back down, who is shielded from legal consequences, into your situation.

    Grandpa isn’t answering his phone or the door and you’re worried? Call a locksmith, not the cops. Cops will just kick the door or call the locksmith anyway, now you have extra problems

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Can we give them the benefit of the doubt, please? They probably thought the child was a dog or a partner of theirs… #ACAB

  • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    7 months ago

    “The Columbus Police Department was conducting a welfare check on a subject following a report of potential self-harm,” Nebraska State Patrol said in a press release.

    “Mission Accomplished”

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The awfulness of the story aside, I do want to put a small bit of appreciation toward ABC News for not dropping some bullshit like “17-year-old man dead following an officer-involved shooting during a welfare check.” The voice is passive still, but at least it cuts to the point, that the kid was killed by a police officer.

    My only notes are that it should say “Officer shot and killed 17-year-old while conducting a welfare check.” As it is, it’s like it’s saying the kid was shot and killed, and it just so happened to be by an officer.

    • AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      My only notes are that it should say “Officer shot and killed 17-year-old while conducting a welfare check.”

      I think the news would have to put allegedly in there somewhere.

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        No ‘allegedly’ required in the passive version, so not required in the active version

        • AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          ‘Allegedly’ is not required because they are quoting the state police:

          A teenager was shot and killed by a police officer responding to a residence in Nebraska to conduct a welfare check, state police said.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      Actually you can… It’s just that the welfare check will result with “dead”.

      Schrodinger could have shot the box a bunch & figured out the cat’s welfare…

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Reminds me of that joke about the hunters in the woods.

      “911, what’s your emergency?”

      Help, my friend got bit by a snake and I think he’s dead!

      “Keep calm, and make sure if he’s actually dead.”

      BLAM

      Okay, he’s definitely dead