• j_roby@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I see what you’re trying to say. But I gotta ask tho: did “we all” actually, really agree on that?

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes. We have all agreed to exchange tokens (which have little to no inherent value) for goods and services, in lieu of trading other goods and services directly.

      All other mechanics surrounding money are up for debate, but for any society more advanced than the hunter-gatherer stage, some form of “money” is required to facilitate trade.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Why? Library economies are moneyless, and highly adaptive to technological progression and climate change.

            • drphungky@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Who makes the consumables in a library economy? Why on earth would I farm for love of the game?

                • drphungky@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Someone else will do it then, surely? I can just play video games and check things out permanently from the library and get free food from the farmer?

                  • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Maybe if you want to piss off the farmer…

                    You are forgetting that there is a component of anonymity that fiat currency provides transactions. You lose that in a social economy.

                    Money is “asocial”.