Denver police have arrested a 13-year-old boy accused of fatally shooting a man whose leg was blocking the aisle on a public bus.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, that would definitely be one of the many, many better arguments for guns than ‘protection against bears and mountain lions.’

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Even then, though, you don’t need pistols for hunting.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I do know of people who hunt with handguns, but it is definitely rarer. I honestly don’t have any issues with hunting if you eat what you hunt. If you just do it to massacre an animal and just leave it where you killed it, fuck you, but I have no issue with responsible hunting practices.

          That said, it’s my understanding that bow hunting is the fastest, and thus most painless way of killing an animal.

          • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            That is completely False.
            I have shells that will cause a 3 to 4 inch cavitation hole when they hit something causing a large amount of damage and blood loss that will kill with any hit in the chest area.

            With a bow, even if you hit the heart it will still take time, especially if you miss and then it is bleeding, suffering, and you have to track it.

            At top skill in both I would say it is a tie in that both have the potential to kill instantly, a bow is more likely to harm than kill at lower skill levels though.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes but you’d struggle to get close enough to make a reliably good shot. Ranged shots are what rifles are for.

            • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Most of the things I’ve shot in my life with the rifle I was close enough I could’ve done it with a pistol.

              We hunt in forests around here not plains.

              • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Pistol shooting practice is typically done at no more than 25 yards, while hunting rifles can more comfortably do a longer range. Sure, you can hit with a pistol at similar ranges (especially with a larger caliber as you propose) but rifles are better for controlling the recoil and typically more accurate. If the goal is to actually hit, and in particular kill painlessly, a rifle is the better tool.

                • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I think the farthest shot I have had was maybe 35 yards.

                  You basically find a good trail and put up a blind or stand near it.

                  We have to cut our own firing lanes so short distances are much preferred. Lol

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Tbf I carry a rifle any time I go in the woods damn near.

        I love nature but am terrified of bears and I want a big firecracker, if it comes down to trying to use it on a bear that wants to fight I am probably already fucked and I know that.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      An activity where you would definitely supervise the child, not send them off on their own on a bus.

        • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I have both and they both have their advantages and disadvantages.

          I prefer my rifle because it has a much much higher chance of a clean quick kill.

          Personally if you are willing to let an animal suffer more to be more “manly” you were never manly at all.

          • BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t do either. I’m primarily vegetarian because I know I wouldn’t want to kill an animal irl so I just generally avoid meat all together.