Masterson has been interned at Corcoran State Prison in Central California and will be eligible for parole in 2042 – when he’s 66 years old

Danny Masterson has been moved to Corcoran State Prison in Central California, where infamous cult leader Charles Manson spent years of his life.

The former That ‘70s Show star, 47, was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison after he was found guilty of raping two women over two decades ago.

Just last week, Masterson was denied bail pending appeal over fears the convicted rapist has “every incentive to flee”.

The Wrap first reported that, according to state records, Masterson has officially been moved to Corcoran after spending time in an LA County lockup and later the North Kern State Prison intake facility.

Records show that the actor will be eligible for parole in 2042 – when he’s 66 years old.

Blogger Jeffrey Augustine reports that Masterson will be housed in the prison’s Level 4 maximum security housing unit – the highest level of security available.

  • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    9 months ago

    From what I understand, the evidence itself wasn’t so damning, it was his complete and total lack of a defense. There were no witnesses or testimony for the defense, and they seemed to rely solely on discrediting the prosecution, which they couldn’t do. It was declared a mistrial the first time, and then retried when he was found guilty on 2 of the 3 charges. It should also be mentioned that it seems as though his lawyers were from the Church of Scientology and were more concerned with sussing out what the LAPD had on David and Shelly Miscavige than on actually defending Masterson, so much so in fact that they subpoena’d records unrelated to the case which the judge ultimately threw out. Masterson was found guilty, and I believe that is the correct verdict, but I also think he was set up by his overlords to be a sacrificial lamb so they could try to get information from the LAPD that would otherwise be confidential. He never stood a chance, but I’m kind of OK with that. Sic Semper Rapists.

    • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Its probably also worth mentioning that his victims were also Scientologists, and therefore ‘forbidden’ from going to the police.

      When they did, they were labelled ‘fair game’ and harrassed by the ‘church’.

      So there was also a Civil suit - filed before but put on hold until after the Criminal trial - that has The Church Of Scientology itself as a co-defendent

      One of the things Masterson’s lawyers were accused of doing was leaking discovery documents from the Criminal case to Scientology’s attorneys in the Civil case

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      What evidence would there even be after 20 years? Unless there’s text message records or something like that I would guess it mostly came down to their word vs his anyway, no?

      • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s exactly why it was so shocking to see him take such a harsh sentence. Typically in a case like this, the verdict is going to side with the defense because if it didn’t, anyone could start throwing wild accusations with no evidence in hopes of a conviction. The fact that it was a twenty year old case with twenty year old evidence and the lawyers couldn’t overcome that or even plea bargain him down to a lesser crime tells me that his lawyers weren’t really looking out for his best interest, but wanted to get through the system as fast as possible to avoid too bright a spotlight on Scientology.

        • vortic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m not disagreeing with you but, if his lawyers were that bad, how has he not appealed based on ineffective representation?

          • quindraco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            That sort of appeal has a close to 100% failure rate. How do you know he hasn’t tried that and gotten nowhere? On top of that, he’d need to hire new lawyers, which is bound to be slow if he can even manage it.

            • madcaesar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Man I’m reading this whole thread trying to find out what he did and how they nailed him, yet I’m not finding any more info. Really surprising such an old case and he gets hammered this hard.

              • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                They had the testimony of three victims who gave detailed descriptions of the rapes. And he did not testify in his defense to refute their testimony. Typical rape cases are difficult to prosecute when it is the victim’s word against the accused’s. In this case, there were three women with very similar stories, and he was silent.

            • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              If Masterson was brainwashed by the Church of Scientology and they appointed a lawyer who turned him into their sacrificial lamb, one would think that he could plausibly play the victim card. If the government was interested in going after the bigwigs at the CoS, he might be able to get a good deal. Masterson is not particularly important in the grand scheme. A case against the CoS that would finally take down someone big, whether the head of the CoS or a big celebrity like Tom Cruise would be amazing. Even better would be to dismantle the whole rotten enterprise.

      • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Im not sure what the evidence was, but there was a 3 year investigation, and two other cases were not brought to charge due to lack of evidence. The prosecution case involved the Scientology cover-up, including attempts to get one of the women to sign an NDA

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      The church had their lawyers represent him, then immediately ex communicated him after his loss. It does seem like they set him up to go down hard, even though he is indeed a rapist, his own lawyers fucked him. Good.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wow that’s crazy. Thanks, that trial always seems so weird to me and I never really understood what was going on, but I also didn’t look enough into it to know anything after the fact.