If lemmy.world finds this, please tell my starving children that I love them.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re right, but on the other hand, no one in the 1980s watched Married With Children and thought, “a shoe salesman? With a house? How absurd!” Because houses were affordable.

      • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        housing used to be affordable. I’ve seen the value of the modest house i grew up in increase in value after my parents sold it so much that I can’t afford to even think about buying it now that i’m the age they were when they bought it. and it looks like the new owners have let it go to shit.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Exactly. People did talk about how homes on TV in the 1980s were unreasonably large, but the idea that Al Bundy’s family or Roseanne’s family couldn’t have a house at all was not even one people considered. Because of course you could afford a house.

          • bouh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Also, you could afford a house at this time with only one person working in the couple. The wife usually stayed at home until they progressively all went to work.