• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Quantum entanglement can’t actually transmit information, it just looks like it can sometimes due to how quantum mechanics can get weird.

    Get a red ball and a blue ball, and two boxes. Close your eyes and out one ball in each box. These box-balls are now “entangled”, in that you know that the contents of one is not the content of the other.
    Send a box to a different country, and open yours. You instantly know that the other ball is red, since yours is blue, but the holder of the other box knows nothing new.

    With the QM, it the same basic setup except both particles are in an indeterminate state, and when you look you’re making it “pick” which state it’s in, and it also makes the other one “pick”.
    You can’t force it to collapse one way or the other without breaking the entanglement either, so it’d be like red-blue ball, and when you force it to be red, the other ball now has a 50/50 chance of also being red.

    My guess for the only way to get some warning would be if the supernova had some form of initial, not-cataclysmic flash or outgassing shortly beforehand.

    • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Neutrino burst typically precedes a supernova, at least I remember reading that somewhere… Don’t ask me where…

    • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is that not just quantum superpositioning, which I thought was technically a separate, though possibly intertwined, concept?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Superposition is just the “it’s in multiple states at once” part. Entanglement is the property of making how one particle comes out of superposition interrelated with how another one does.