• BetaBlake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    314
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    He wasn’t “starved”, it says right there in the article that he was given his last meal this morning (Thursday) and allowed no solids after 10am because he suffered from nausea and was worried he’d vomit.

    It’s okay to be anti-execution but you don’t have to make shit up to be inflammatory, there’s plenty of other valid reasons to be against execution but making sure a man doesn’t choke on his own vomit isn’t one of them.

    • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Plus they’re trying to say he suffocated like it was torture, no they used nitrogen specifically so it didn’t activate the body’s panic response to lack of oxygen. He just fell asleep.

      Edit: he didn’t just fall asleep because he probably held his breath, according to the article, which I didnt read. In my defense I had a news app blocker on (clearly barely working)

      • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        9 months ago

        And the reason that works is that your body doesn’t actually detect low oxygen. When you hold your breath for a long time, the sensation comes from high CO2 levels. That’s one reason that working in a hydrogen or helium airship is dangerous, because there can be a leak and you won’t even notice until passing out.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Also he specifically requested that they used nitrogen over other methods.

        He later changed his request to death by firing squad, but I suspect that may have been a delaying tactic rather than an actual preference.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Which is so much better than injectables, which ARE torture. They get injected with a tranq first so they don’t show signs of struggle or pain when the actual death shot is given.

        • maccentric@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          If fentanyl is so cheap, available, and deadly, why don’t they just use that? Probably because they want their pound of flesh.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        He just fell asleep.

        eyewitness accounts disagree

        "Smith’s spiritual adviser, the Rev. Jeff Hood, who’d previously expressed concern that the method could be inhumane, witnessed the execution and described it in more graphic terms, saying it was ‘the most horrible thing I’ve ever seen.’

        Smith, wearing a tight-fitting mask that covered his entire face, convulsed when the gas was turned on, ‘popped up on the gurney’ repeatedly, and gasped, heaved and spat, Hood said.

        ‘It was absolutely horrific,’ he said."

        “Smith, who was on a gurney, appeared conscious for “several minutes into the execution,” and “shook and writhed” for about two minutes after that, media witnesses said in a joint report.”

        https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/26/us/alabama-execution-nitrogen-what-we-know/index.html

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Witnesses described writhing:

        Smith appeared to remain conscious for several minutes after the nitrogen was activated, according to five journalists who were allowed to watch the execution through glass as media witnesses. Although the mask was also secured to the gurney, he then began shaking his head and writhing for about two minutes, and then could be seen breathing deeply for several minutes before his breathing slowed and became imperceptible, the witnesses said.

        • Perfide@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          9 months ago

          They think he was holding his breath, so the CO2 concentration in his blood would have risen. Between the CO2 build up and just knowing you are about to be killed, it’s not surprising he started panicking and writhing.

          That’s what people miss when touting nitrogen asphyxiation as humane. It’s only humane if the person being killed willingly gives themselves over to the process and takes nice deep breaths. If they’re not willing to die of course they’re still going to resist to the best of their abilities and try and get the mask off.

        • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          At least part of that was attributed to him holding his breath for as long as possible once they started administrating the gas.

          • atomicorange@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I totally get the impulse, but breathing in nitrogen wasn’t the thing that would harm him. It’s just lack of oxygen, which holding your breath isn’t going to help.

            Legal execution is fucking sickening, It’s horrifying that we did that to him.

            • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              What’s even more sickening is him stabbing that woman to death, can you imagine how much fear and pain she went through?

              • lordkuri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yes, and 2 wrongs make a right of course. /s

                Or maybe it’s about vengeance and not about paying a due to society?

                • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  It is about vengeance and also about not perpetually providing room and board for someone who lost their rights when they decided to take someone else’s rights to life away.

                  Edit: why would they have an inalienable right to life, even if it is a meager life in prison, if they decided they can takeinnocent people’s lives for their own deranged reasons?

                  • letsgo@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    That’s easy to answer. Justice is not perfect, and sooner or later you will execute an innocent person. We know this has happened in the UK, because DNA evidence proved that the person couldn’t have been there, and they would have been released had they not been executed.

                    Death is final and you don’t just respawn at your bed, so this is the worst possible outcome. Abolishing the death penalty avoids this terrible situation, and yes it means you keep people like this alive until their natural death, but it also maximises the chance that new evidence can be found that proves that person didn’t in fact commit the crime.

              • atomicorange@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Yes, I think that should be illegal too! You’d have to be absolutely mental to want to kill someone.

        • Fuck spez@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          “Writhing” (or maybe just convulsions that looked like writhing considering the restraints) after he no longer appeared to be conscious. NAD but my guess is this was a hypoxic seizure, an event of which he couldn’t possibly have been aware.

          Edit: Assuming I’m right, and if we ever get to the point where this is proven to be a “humane” form of execution, then the convulsions could reasonably be prevented with muscle relaxing drugs the same way they’re are prevented during surgery or lethal injection… But I’d rather we just get to the point where we see the whole concept of retributive justice as inhumane.

        • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is pretty surprising, everything I’ve read indicates that he should indeed have been out in seconds. I wonder if the mask was a bad fit or the nitrogen wasn’t pure?

          • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            Definitely not seconds. If that were the case, simply holding your breath for a few seconds would be enough to make you pass out. That myth comes from chokeholds, which are not the same thing, and (when done properly) don’t actually stop the person from breathing. Instead, they put pressure on the arteries, to cut off the brain’s blood supply directly.

            Actual asphyxiation takes several minutes, as the oxygen in your blood is slowly consumed. For nitrogen asphyxiation, you get a wicked endorphin high as your brain realizes it’s low on oxygen and releases endorphins to try and keep you awake. (Side note, this is why autoerotic asphyxiation is a thing. People do it intentionally to get that endorphin release and make orgasms more powerful.) But your sense of suffocation actually comes from high amounts of carbonic acid in your blood; Carbonic acid is from CO2, (it’s also what gives carbonated drinks that characteristic bitter taste, and is why flat soda tastes cloyingly sweet without the bitter carbonic acid to counter the sweetness.) Since the CO2 never builds up in your system, you never get the sense of suffocation. You just get that euphoric endorphin high, then you fall asleep.

            Nitrogen asphyxiation is actually how I’d prefer to go out, if I got to choose. Like if I were in a lot of pain in my elder years and simply wanted to die, nitrogen asphyxiation is how I’d want to do it. But I also recognize that at that point it would be a choice, not something the state is forcing upon me. This dude was forced into it, which means there’s a much higher chance of him panicking regardless of the method.

          • atomicorange@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It’s definitely not just seconds. Think about how long you can hold your breath, you’d be conscious for at least that long. You start getting brain damage after like 4 minutes without oxygen, and can live for maybe 6 minutes.

            Edit: I’m wrong here! See the reply for why.

            • MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t think this is quite right. Read up on “time of useful consciousness”. I think if you exhale the air in your lungs and inhale oxygen-free air you’ll be out much faster than if you just held your breath. I’m not entirely sure if total pressure matters or partial pressure matters, but I’m quite sure that there will be some similar effect. I have found some claims that the partial pressure is the major factor, so breathing pure nitrogen seems like it would incapacitate someone faster than holding their breath does, because the nitrogen is actively removing oxygen from their blood.

              • atomicorange@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                You are totally right. I looked into it a bit, the mistake I made was assuming that we’re more efficient at extracting oxygen from the air than we actually are. A held breath contains quite a lot of usable oxygen, which we can extract over minutes of time. Breathing in nitrogen would rapidly replace that still fairly-oxygenated air with pure nitrogen, and evidently our blood doesn’t carry more than a few seconds worth of oxygen.

                Thanks for the gentle correction!

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Also leaving out the fact that the executed and his lawyer both said this method was preferential to lethal injection.