• centof@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Dean Phillips got right around 20% even with the fact that Biden did a write in. I’m honestly kinda surprised it’s that low. I would have expected there to be more than that considering the write-in.

    Not that it matters since the DNC took away New Hampshire’s say in the matter by nullifying their delegates. It is kinda horrifying that a private organization (the DNC) can just decide who has a say in choosing which candidates of the 2 we get to choose between.

    • grozzle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      the USA isn’t really supposed to have political parties like you do now.

      Washington and other “founding fathers” argued against a party system, and there are no references to parties in the Constitution or other original documents mandating how elections are conducted.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The reality is that in any other country a private organization (=a party committee) decides who is the candidate for their party, and therefore who the public can vote for

    • PopcornTin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s always been the way. Even if the plebs vote for someone not approved by the party (ie Bernie), they have super delegates that get to outvote the others to promote their choice.

        • ObsidianBlk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          The sad thing is you’re technically correct only because it’s people with a similar mindset to you on the matter that perpetuate this idea.

          • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            No, it’s technically correct because the math just doesn’t work in favor of third parties. That can change, but you have to put in a lot more effort than just voting at every opportunity.

            • ObsidianBlk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              The point was, the only reason only two parties exist in this country has less to do with any mechanical reason why and more to do with the fact that a huge number of people, such as yourself, continue cementing into people’s minds that any alternative choice is worthless. Effectively, by continuing to perpetuate this idea over and over again in peoples minds, you have effectively created a self fulfilling prophecy.

              You are technically, right. A third option has little to no chance, but only because people, such as yourself, have continued to tell others that a third options had little to no chance.

      • centof@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure you can, but what you can do is irrelevant. Even if you do it is guaranteed not to have a say nationally because of our first past the post voting system locks out any competition. You have 2 meaningful choices, anything else is locked out by our voting system and rendered non meaningful.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          With the right candidate you could trick both major parties into secretly funding them as a spoiler candidate for the other party. You just need to say things that make headlines that people will engage with and come up with three word zingers that people will chant. Just say ambiguous shit and people will interpret it however they want to. There’s people winning elections as libertarians, so it’s totally possible with a more appealing platform.