JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-28 个月前Fitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up11.36Karrow-down125
arrow-up11.33Karrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-28 个月前message-square127fedilink
minus-squarePsythik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·8 个月前Watches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
minus-squareAceticon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31·8 个月前Yeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up13·8 个月前honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
minus-squareshea@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down11·8 个月前it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
minus-squareipkpjersi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 个月前True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.
Watches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
Yeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.