pbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 8 months agoTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square269fedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down1108cross-posted to: foss@beehaw.organarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.comtil@lemmy.world
arrow-up1411arrow-down1external-linkTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgpbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 8 months agomessage-square269fedilinkcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.organarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.comtil@lemmy.world
minus-squaretherealjcdenton@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down13·edit-28 months agoThere are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
minus-squareUnmapped@lemmy.mlcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·8 months agoAnarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
minus-squarechobeat@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·8 months agoCommenting with no clue what people are talking about
minus-squareCowbee [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 months agoAnarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.
There are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
Anarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
Commenting with no clue what people are talking about
Anarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.