I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren’t worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ll disagree to a point on liquor.

    I like single-malt Scottish whiskey. I like Islays the most, followed by Speysides, Cambelltowns, Highlands, and Lowlands (in that order). I’ve found that, generally speaking, the longer a whiskey has been aged, the better it’s going to be at mellowing out the harsher flavors in a given distillery’s offerings. Compared to blended whiskeys–which are usually cheaper–single malt, and single barrel are a better experience in my opinion. I’m usually paying $50-200 for something that I’ll really enjoy, with most being in the $100-150 range.

    But $5000 for a 40yo bottle of Macallen? Absolutely not.

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I heard whisky can be quite expensive, so I retract my point on whisky. The liquor I had in mind is mainly tequila, which is generally rather cheap.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        FWIW, whiskey is expensive because the market had grown sharply, and production runs a minimum of seven years behind demand (for Scottish whiskey, due to laws on aging). Ten years ago you could get a perfectly decent Laphroaig for $25-35; now it’s more like $60 for the same thing.

      • foreman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I will say legit well crafted tequila I had in Mexico, was so tasty you could drink it straight. No clue the price, but there are def differences and pretty much all of the cheaper tequila in America sucks ass.