A stark example of how digital footprints will be utilized in a post-Roe America

The article is from Aug 10, 2022 but remains relevant

  • JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is not a different issue. It is an issue of basic human rights.

    I don’t believe it’s a basic human right to murder a late term foetus. That’s not a right enshrined in any UN convention or national constitution. That’s something you want.

    • Killakomodo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah but your opinion is total shit and worthless … so who cares what you gotta say?

      awe seems I pissed off religious extremists how ever would I sleep at night after this, oh yeah just fine.

        • Killakomodo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Don’t know why you are getting mad at me, I replied to a person against abortion, which I disagree with. Not you, who said it was a human right, which I agree with. So I do care about making sure abortion is legal, I don’t care to listen to the religious extremist horseshit ideals on why it should be illegal.

          I assume you just got the notification because it’s your post and assumed I was talking to you when I am not saying your opinion does not matter, just peoples opinion that want’s to take away human rights.

          • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m sorry. I completely misunderstood and assumed you were replying to me. I apologize and have deleted my misguided response.

      • Pandantic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, I’m pro-choice and I downvoted you because you would rather troll this person and add to the negativity than state your case. I downvoted them too, for the record.

        • Killakomodo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why make a case to people who have no want to hear said case, have probably heard all the cases already and continue to want to control people? I am done talking to people that want to decide others lives and put them at risk, they don’t care about them so why should I care about the person trying to retain control?

          I am willing to explain myself to you, but you as stated do not intend to steal rights and you being pro choice already know all the reasons why I am against people taking others rights so I don’t have to explain it because it is falling either on ears that know or ears that don’t want to hear.

          I am sick off pretending malice is ignorance.

          I am just telling them to get lost as we should with all people that want to take others rights.

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Do any constitutions or UN conventions give you the right to use the internet? Shouldn’t this count as healthcare, for which there are at least 6 UN conventions? Don’t 13 states ban all forms of abortion including early, in which not even the heart has formed?

    • ladychelseaofthevoid@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no such thing as a late term abortion. The fetus would be viable. No person seeking an abortion would wait seven to nine months, bullshit laws or no bullshit laws. An abortion is a termination of a pregnancy, not a fetus. Abortions are typically performed before the embryo even has a chance to develop into a fetus (10 weeks).