• steventhedev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    The lawmaker in question is Moshe Saada, number 28 out of 32 MKs from Likud (Israeli elections fix an order for each party, and legislative seats are awarded by that order).

    He gave an interview on Channel 14, which is generally regarded as extremely right wing in Israel. Ahmad Tibi, number 1 on the Ta’al list, was the one who called him out for the statement:

    MK Moshe Saada, Likud ,is trying to get on the shameful list of people in South Africa’s lawsuit against Israel at the High Court in The Hague. Stupid and criminal words

    Moshe Saada said this in response to the article:

    I understand that there is a “journalist” who took a sentence I said in an interview and took it out of context with a lack of integrity, just to light a little fire, divide a little more and sow hatred. Those who watched the interview can hear that I repeatedly said that Hamas must be destroyed. The time has come for the media to also move forward from 6.10 and realize that it is time to unite around the fight against the enemy who seeks to destroy us, instead of constantly engaging in attempts to slander elected officials

    The full interview is here on youtube (In Hebrew, no translation available).

    He only said it once in a 13 minute interview and every other instance he’s talking explicitly about Hamas (L’hashmid Ha’Hamas). I’m guessing it was him searching for a word to include both Hamas and PIJ, but that might be too generous. But anyone thinking this is an official policy of Israel and that’s the way forward is delusional - almost every country on Earth has extremist members of their legislature.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Funny how when it comes to Israeli extremists we all discuss nuance and how complicated and messy politics and language is but when it comes to extremists in resistance organizations it’s immediately assumed that what they say colours the entire resistance.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which extremists in resistance orgs are you referencing?

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Lol it’s always so fun that they’ll speak in code but never acknowledge the actual abhorrence of the things they support.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Everyone who supports Hamas, like the poster above is doing by referring to them as a “resistance group” with “a few radicals.”

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    SCB is a professional at missing the point. You don’t respond to them to have a discussion, just to pop the balloon for people coming in after.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I definitely understood, yes. Hamas is not a “resistance org”, and they don’t have a “few extremists”. Every member of Hamas is an extremist who is willing to torture and murder Palestinians who challenge them.

                    https://www.newsweek.com/hamas-tortured-me-dissent-heres-what-they-really-think-palestinians-opinion-1857169

                    That is not a resistance group. They are all extremists, by definition, because Hamas is a Jihadist Islamist group, even if you take Israel completely off the table.

                    In their own words:

                    “Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes,” Hamas said in its first statement in the late 1980s.

                    https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/doctrine-hamas

                    Support for the Palestinian people neither requires, nor implies, support for Hamas, and support for Hamas is, definitionally, not support for the Palestinian people.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Hamas was literally formed as a reaction to the continued illegal occupation of Palestinian territories by Israel and the corruption of Fatah and the Palestinian Authority. That’s literally a resistance group. Nobody said they weren’t also culpable in some heinous shit but Israel has several politicians in ministerial positions calling for genocide, just with different words like, “Clear them out” or “significantly reduce the population of Gazans”. And of the two Israel is the one with the power to do it. So yeah that’s who I’m going to worry about.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Hamas was literally formed as a reaction to the continued illegal occupation of Palestinian territories

                Hamas was literally formed because the Palestinian government was becoming too secular and was too interested in peace with Israel.

                Here is an interview, with quotes, and details, with a literal expert on th subject who is also Pro-Palestinian.

                How Hamas got elected:

                KEAR: The key Fatah people - most of Fatah are living in the diaspora. They’re the ones living in the four-story houses, driving around in their gold Mercedes. They’re not experiencing the day-to-day privations of the occupation, whereas Hamas - they’re a product of the occupation. You can see them walking in the streets. You can see them at the market. People may not necessarily agree with their narrative, with the - as an Islamist movement. They get a lot of respect for the fact that they live amongst the community.

                ARABLOUEI: As the first intifada went on, many Palestinians became more and more frustrated not only with the occupation but with the PLO/Fatah as it attempted to negotiate a two-state solution with Israel.

                ELGINDY: The reality was that Fatah and some of the smaller parties were interested in joining a peace process that would result in a compromise situation of a West Bank and Gaza state.

                KEAR: And certainly by this stage, 1987, 20 years of occupation - what have the PLO done? When I say PLO, what has Fatah done? Nothing, virtually. We’ve been fighting for 20 years, resisting for 20 years. Nothing has changed. In fact, it’s actually gotten worse, where we are further away from an independent state than we’ve ever been before.

                Israel did not become aggressive to Hamas until after they began terrorist activities.

                BACONI: “Hamas Contained: The Rise And Pacification Of Palestinian Resistance.” When Hamas was established out of that structure and it began to engage in resistance activities…

                ARABLOUEI: Like attacks on military posts and abducting Israeli soldiers.

                BACONI: …Immediately, Israel’s approach to dealing with Hamas changed, and it stopped being one of approval. It started being an antagonistic relationship because obviously now it’s a resistance party.

                HACHAM: In retrospective, I think this was - I call it the original sin of the Israeli authorities - Israeli security authorities that did not understand that period of time what can be developed of this innocent organization movement, al-Mujama al-Islamiya.

                https://www.npr.org/transcripts/1198908227#:~:text=ARABLOUEI%3A So Sheikh Yassin and,Islamist ideology created the organization.

                This frustration and aggression is also detailed in the original Hamas charter

                https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp

                You don’t have to agree with Israel’s government, response, or how this war is being prosecuted, to understand that

                1: Hamas is an islamic terror organization that usurped a government and denies democracy to millions

                2: Hamas cannot and will not back down, because Jihad is their sole purpose for existing

                3: A two state solution was one-track, and is always infinitely more possible with any other Palestinian leadership.

                Support for Hamas is always wrong. Gazans who support Hamas today are wrong, but they do not deserve to be killed or to suffer as they have been.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Lmao, you’re still trying to tie Hamas of 2023 to Hamas of 1987. Even the article you cite has the expert calling it a resistance organization. Then you add in that Jihad is their only purpose for existing. That’s you. Not them. This isn’t AQ/ISIS. They have one, very clear, reasonable demand that we are bending over backwards to avoid. If Israel ended their occupation and submitted to a UN mission for peacekeeping and elections Hamas would lose all of it’s reason for existence. Believe it or not, people don’t like to commit suicide or murder. They have to be driven to it. Militaries do it by training and indoctrination, resistance groups just hoover up broken people who were Indoctrinated by oppression.

                  Which is why the number one way of ending political violence always has been and always will be bringing the group into the decision making process if it’s at all reasonable. That’s why you see a peace process in Colombia, but cult deprogramming and military action with ISIS. As long as conservatives can count on sheep like you running around shouting, “they just hate us for no reason!” They will have cover to continue the cycle of oppression.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    We are specifically talking about the formation of Hamas in this conversation. I was rebutting your points.

                    Funny you try to skim past that.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s because they’re politicians in a political structure where different views exist and matter.

        As opposed to a group of insurgents where their level of extremism is irrelevant. If you’re a part of the group willing to resort to mass murder and kidnapping you’re in the “too extreme” group already.

        Asking for a nuanced view of “resistance fighters” is like asking for a nuanced view of serial killers, they’re all a problem. Trying to identify which serial killer did it for the correct reasons or doesn’t really want to kill people but does anyways is a ridiculous concept.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          So mass arrests of protestors and holding them without charge is what?

          And they’re literally committing genocide in front of your eyes.

          At what point do you figure it out?

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      anyone thinking this is an official policy of Israel

      …need only look at their actions to confirm that

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Pretty sure if Israel really wanted to kill every Gazan things would look dramatically different right now.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          it wouldn’t look “dramatically” different, maybe slightly. I think its more they want gazans gone and don’t care about how many people they kill.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Not really. The next step would be a systematic approach that could not be politically defended. They’re doing as much as they think they can get away with. And if, as several influential and high ranking Israelis have said, they’re clearing land for more settlements then it’s the ethnic cleansing form of genocide.

          • nexguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            That is a possibility but we will have to remember this conversation in a year or two and see if they have placed settlements in Gaza or not.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  UN peacekeeping mission in the short term. Within the year remove Israeli police and military from all settlements. At that point Hamas can accept a peace and elections or lose any goodwill from Gazans and the UN can conduct a standard counter insurgency.

                  • nexguy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    That would be best case scenario no doubt… but WE can’t do it so we just have to wait.

    • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I support palestine but this kind of reporting definitely seems dishonest. There absolutely is an argument to be made about it being a slip up and a showing of true colors, but saying this is clear evidence for the intent of a genocide is dishonest and only hurting the movement to free palestine. Thanks for pointing out that it was the only time in the interview where he says gazans, not hamas.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, it is as clear as yet another GOP representative saying we should ban abortion. That is obviously their party’s position. This is not the first Likuud member to outright call for a genocide. It is obviously the position of the Likuud party. Who happens to control the military and police in both Palestine and Israel.

      • Skeezix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        And keep in mind that the dishonesty extends to the OP, of which there are many in this sub with the motive to disseminate inaccurate rage bait articles.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Imagine if everyone in the world assumed that everything that came out of Marjorie Taylor Greene’s mouth was official US policy

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      In context of everything else that’s happening, other remarks by his party, and the availability of “It’s clear to everyone that militants in Gaza must be destroyed.” There is no excuse. It’s just another layer of evidence.

    • LobYonder@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure there are some extremists in almost every political faction, but were his comments denounced by others in his party?

      • steventhedev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        On the one hand it’s a factual article about events that are clearly true. On the other it’s sensationalized and making a mountain out of a molehill.

        The quality of the discussion on this article is bottom of the barrel “I hate Israel and you should too”.