From the article:

When we went to our seats, the wait staff let us know that despite the fact that the previews were playing, we wouldn’t know until the movie actually started whether we could see the film or not. If it didn’t work, the screen would just turn black. Luckily, the film went through without a hitch.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    210
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    1st Jan? Smells like an expired certificate somewhere in whatever chain of DRM bullshit they use.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        89
        ·
        10 months ago

        Made even worse by Sony, the manufacturer, completely exiting that market. I wonder if/how Sony will fix this, are there even staff on hand there with the technical details for their projector’s DRM anymore?

        It speaks volumes about how silly DRM is when a massive game publisher like TakeTwo/Rockstar resorts to selling a pirated version of their own game 🤦‍♂️

        The next time this happens those projectors may end up being $20000 bricks, and I’m not too sure how many independents will be able to afford dumping a quarter of a million to replace all their projector screens

        • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          55
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not too sure how many independents will be able to afford dumping a quarter of a million to replace all their projector screens

          Don’t worry, thanks to this amazing thing called capitalism a big chain will happily buy out those struggling independents at a fraction of their actual worth.

  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    watch a literal half hour of ads and then maybe, if you’re very lucky, you get to watch the movie you paid for.

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    10 months ago

    Pay attention boys and girls, this is also what they want to do with over the air broadcasts with the ATSC 3.0 format.

    • YoorWeb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Remember that time when they’ve added rootkits to over 20 millions of audio cd’s? You’ve guessed it, the installation was automatic, hidden and their software had vulnerabilities.

      One of the programs would install and “phone home” with reports on the user’s private listening habits, even if the user refused its end-user license agreement (EULA), while the other was not mentioned in the EULA at all. Both programs contained code from several pieces of copylefted free software in an apparent infringement of copyright.

      • hideo@lemmyhub.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        DRM but over the air, consumers hate it, investors love it, it’ll make everything worse, it’s the future!

        • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          10 months ago

          Do investors really love it? Is there anyone as stupid as the group-think whole that believes that will stop even one act of piracy?

          All these idiotic measures have clearly driven more people to piracy…

          • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            10 months ago

            I doubt the investors are smart enough to understand the technology behind it. All they probably hear and fully understand is the part where they can potentially make more money in the long run.

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            Money people are literally too stupid to understand anything other than line go up or line go down. They were told line would go up if DRM, so that’s what they want.

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        10 months ago

        So broadcast TV currently broadcasts on ATSC 1.0. You get an antenna and a box or TV that has a digital tuner and you’re good. Industry is pushing for ATSC 3.0, which allows for DRM. So even though they are broadcasting on the public airwaves, they can decide you can’t watch. It sets up the local broadcasters to be the new cable with ever increasing prices AND play king maker on devices by choosing which can and cannot produce tuners. In my area, 5 channels have ATSC 3.0, and 1 of them turned on DRM. Meaning I can’t watch it because HDHomeRun devices aren’t approved, likely because it has the ability to record. Luckily, that channel still broadcasts in ATSC 1.0, so I can still watch it for now. 3.0 isn’t a fully adopted yet, but that can change in the future (2027?).

        • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          So at some point, it’ll be impossible to get emergency broadcast alerts without a subscription to something, right? Like who’s gonna turn on a TV or radio that they can’t use in anticipation of some emergency they can’t predict?

            • shrugal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I’m sorry, but I think that’s a little far fetched.

              Are you really suggesting that we run the risk of being too disconnected to receive emergency messages?! In an age where everyone has a smartphone on their person at all times, as well as at least a dozen internet-connected devices in their homes, offices, classrooms etc?!

              You would’ve had a point maybe 20 years ago, but technology has changed a bit since then.

                • shrugal@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  It’s not, because the statement is much more accurate in the case of internet-connected devices, and for emergency messages it’s enough to have someone around you who has one (e.g. a neighbour). I guess it would be really hard to find someone - in the areas where this change is made - who doesn’t have access to such a device in that sense, maybe even impossible.

                  It’s really more like assuming everyone breathes air because most people do.

              • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah this was nonsense. Like it is mandated to have a TV always on to receive such emergency broadcasts. Same thing can happen to someone not having or not using a TV

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    10 months ago

    The way we murder DRM is by it affecting the business bottom line.

    This might be an offense worthy of litigation if Sony is not sufficiently contrite.

    It’s telling how unfriendly the DRM is, that it doesn’t inform the protectionist of problems until the minute the show starts.

    Sony is a real dick.

    • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      DRM only affects paying customers. It plays no role in effectively combatting piracy.

      Only good service and good pricing is effective against piracy.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        While I completely agree with you based on the data, DRM is absolutely sold to publishers on the pretense that it combats piracy, at least with keeping paying customers from engaging with media in ways the publishers don’t like (such as lending content or selling that content used in a secondary market).

        And yes, the more draconian their restrictions, the more they drive people to resources that provide cracked or DRM-free content. That said, Sony is notorious for going to extreme lengths to severely limit use of their content outside narrow consumption, often with obligatory ad-viewing, driving people to either piracy, or avoiding Sony content at all.

        At one point, I might have been interested in playing Horizon Zero Dawn and went from buying it, to getting a refund to thinking about pirating it to eventually deciding I cannot be bothered. But then I steer clear of most AAA game companies, now.

      • Exulion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean unfortunately denuvo has been pretty effective lately. It’s not uncrackable but not a lot of effort is being put into it other than when Empress feels like it.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve built DCPs (Digital Cinema Package, the format that protectors use) and the DRM part is always so finicky. I’m surprised this doesn’t happen more often.

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve never worked on this stuff but I’ve looked it up before. Essentially, theatres get a DCP but it’s unplayable without a Key Delivery Message (KDM).

        My understanding is that theatres order these and pay a fee for each one. The KDM is only valid to unlock a specific DCP, on a specific projector, on a specific date and time. It won’t work if any of these checks are off meaning you can’t check that it works until the theatre is filled with patrons who paid to see your movie, as the KDM will only decrypt the movie seconds before playtime. If there’s some glitch, a theatre manager needs to call a hotline for a new KDM.

      • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s been over 10 years since I worked in a movie theater but this is the gist:

        Hard Drives with the film are derived via FedEx and the films are encrypted with symmetric AES keys which are emailed to our theater. These keys allow us to play back the film for a window of time. Sometimes we’re sent keys to unlock different times if a film gets an extended release.

        Some studios (Disney being the worst) would send you keys late into the evening, requiring staff to stay late to test for the following day. Sometimes they’d send us the wrong keys and it would take a long time to get the correct keys emailed to us.

  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    If only there was a technology that allowed theaters to play movies in an analogue manner that they were in 100% control of. That would be cool. Why hasn’t that ever been invented?

      • taanegl@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, and freighting, protecting and maintaining 30mm films in cans is a pain.

      • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        And the fact that your access can vanish for no reason at any time.

        Also… internet crash. That’s going to be fun for folks.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        im looking at a future that no longer has any working film production equipment because nobody makes parts for such things

        • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Somebody’s collecting all those old projectors and celluloid and that person is going to be the coolest person in whatever city they are in depending on the celluloid they also collect.

          In fact — in Portland — a big assed projector would go over huge even today.

          I think people are sick to death of the magic of digital streaming.

      • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes — but local projectionists maintain the ability to restore the ability to present the films.

        When corporations are in charge of everything, humanity is a powerless minion holding its icky tiny gruel filled bowl and whining, “please, sir, May I have some more.”

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Sony is having trouble with their projectors”

    Why not call it out for the bullshit that it is? “Sorry, but greedy bullshit capitalism has failed you as a customer. The lockouts they’ve put on their media to punish the honest users is doing its job once again to punish you. We sure hope this doesn’t lead you to find alternative ways to enjoy media without all of the DRM lockouts and garbage to punish you.”

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because if they wrote that down then they would never be able to put on another Sony movie ever again. They would be out of business in short order.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Because I saw accounts elsewhere that Sony is only providing parts and support for these projectors now, and Alamo is changing vendors. They half assed it, not Sony.

      These are all accounts I saw on The Verge and I cannot independently verify them.

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        So Sony sold them projectors, locked down their media, and then forces theatres to buy new projectors every x number of years to keep up with DRM? Sounds like a lot of unnecessary waste…

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sony is actual abandoning the industry so all the theaters with Sony projectors have to get new ones from elsewhere as Sony is only going to provide parts and support. I’ve been forced to deal with the “support” left for dead products many times, it’s always the absolute bare minimum designed to make you move away from the product finally so they can sunset the skeleton support crew

        • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Good news! Sony has exited the business, and its basically Alamo’s fault they didn’t move faster on their vendor change.

          These are all accounts I saw on The Verge and I cannot independently verify them.

          I know these are issues with any tech but the amount of expertise and culture around 70mm film at least guarantees its continued adoption for some.

          • brax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ah, so “Company provided service, but then ditched it and now theatres are left to buy more expensive (and likely locked down) hardware in hopes the next company doesn’t pull the rug on them again”

            • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Companies exiting a market and leaving clients/customers without their service isn’t a new thing. Was happening well before DRM was even thought of, let alone implemented. And still happens now. Polaroid leaving the instant photo market comes to mind.

  • vsis@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    10 months ago

    I also assume it’s an expired certificate.

    See, this is what happens when certificates are not renewed automatically.

    The article says the projectos are discontinued. That’s probably the reason no one is monitoring these certs.

    Another glorious benefit of DRM.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I work at a movie theater and while we don’t use Sony projectors, we were told to check all of our certificates to prevent this from happening. This sounds like a communication issue to me. Someone didn’t do their job in time. Also in the article it says they wouldn’t know if the film would work until it actually played. If that is either an outright lie or the equipment is designed horribly. On the projectors we use which are going on a decade old, the playlist won’t even start if it can’t verify that all of the content is playable and unlocked. We can see when our certificates expire as well so if all of these certificates expired at the beginning of the year. The theater should have already caught that and had the certificates reissued. Keeping in mind that this wasn’t some sort of bug or glitch that nobody could have predicted, then disregard everything I said. DRM on movie theater. Projectors is an industry standard and all companies use it, not just Sony. Until the actual reason comes out, it’s hard to say. If it’s the certificates of the projectors themselves and not the movie keys which are two different things then yeah I could see how nobody knew what was going on. Especially if the projectors are discontinued. I do know that if our servers lose power and the CMOS battery goes dead, they will internally destroy themselves and never function again. This is to prevent piracy I assume.

    • DonPiano@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      I do know that if our servers lose power in the CMOS battery is dead and then they will internally destroy themselves and never function again. This is to prevent piracy I assume.

      Holy shit, DRM needs to fuck off and die.

    • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      or the equipment os designed horribly

      I find this entirely believable. There’s a LOT of equipment out there designed for profit over user experience.

      But you’re right, it’s not really worth speculating over.

      • JCreazy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I guess if someone really wanted to they could even with the DRM but the DRM just makes it more difficult.

      • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Not a cinema guy, but assuming those movies are encrypted with modern standards, it is practically impossible if you simply would steal the media. Could be done if you could tap into the original playback device where movie plays and pull decrypted copy out of it.

        Edit: As per this AES 128 is used so good luck if you ever stumble upon an encrypted copy.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Probably very low due to the DRM. Cinema leaks are extremely rare since they are encrypted and all that.

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not familiar with cinema projectors, but as I have gatherered from this forum problem is caused by KDM (used to decrypt movie) provider / reseller called Deluxe. Neither Sony or this cinema chain is at fault and problem indeed seems worldwide.

      I do know that if our servers lose power and the CMOS battery goes dead, they will internally destroy themselves and never function again. This is to prevent piracy I assume.

      Find it very hard to believe to be honest. Could this be simply some rumour from colleagues? Doubt any vendor would implement anything like this, drives could be simply encrypted to protect data if they ever get stolen.

      • JCreazy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, I deal with KDMs weekly but I’m not for sure if this issue was KDM related or if it was certificate related. As for the service destroying themselves, I’ve never personally seen it happen, but I’ve been told by upper management that they’ve seen it happen twice. I don’t really have any way to verify the information but it wouldn’t surprise me and I don’t see why anyone would make that up unless they really don’t want people messing with it, but it seems like such an unlikely scenario.

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Curious about something, maybe you know since you work at a theater. I seem to remember hearing that a theater has to pay royalties each time they show a movie and that newer technology can track and report this automatically. Does the latest technology automatically track this as I recall? And if so, would playing a movie as a test count as a showing?

      • JCreazy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        While this certainly may be possible, I don’t think it’s tracked to that degree. Theaters pay to lease a film and the studio decides if there are special rules for being shown. Some smaller known movies have deals with the theaters to show the film at a very low cost in order to get people to watch it. On the first weekend most of the ticket profit goes to the studios and then every week the profit to the studios gets lower and the theaters get more of that money depending on what was agreed on. Some movies like the Taylor Swift concert film could only be shown after 12:00 p.m. and only Thursday through Sunday for example. Say there was a busy night and we sold out of a show, we could cancel a different show and play that sold out movie in another auditorium to fit more people in. This is fine for most studios except for Disney, if Disney finds out that you cancel one of their films to show a different film, they will not be happy. As far as I know we can show movies and definitely as long as we have the keys active for them and I don’t think the specific amount of time is reported back to the studios, we are just required to play it a minimum amount of times.

    • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve gotten bad keys from the studio before, usually when we were doing advanced screenings. It was a relatively quick fix… I think the longest delay was ~15 minutes. I never had to cancel a show because of it, certainly didn’t have to close the entire building.

      For as much as I loved the convenience of digital, I really miss the days of 35 film.

      • JCreazy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        35mm was a whole thing and while I miss the nostalgia, I certainly don’t miss the upkeep and the problems with film. Digital is so much easier. I feel the biggest issue with digital is if a problem goes wrong, there’s really not much you can do outside of standard problem fixes. If it’s an internal issue. You’re just screwed until the technician can fix it.

        • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I agree that moving to digital saved so much time, and I’ll never miss brainwraps or thrown platters… but working booth shifts threading projectors were some of the happiest times I had running theaters.

  • alamodrafthousesucks@lemmyhub.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fuck them. Alamo Drafthouse is a bad company who got bought out by a hedge fund. They treated their employees like they’re slaves. They used to make people clock out to clean the public bathrooms and theaters. Their justification “you get tips”.

    All the food is gross and handled by the most subservient drug addicts or drunks they can find.

    They replaced a lot of experienced management with fresh grad students who had no culinary experience and the blame was shifted to the back of house staff.

    If you ate at any of them you probably ate stuff that fell on the floor because since the wait staff is afraid of both the management and the customer they’d take it out on the cooks who give free floor seasoning to impatient people when accidents happen.

    I saw a cook impale their foot with a knife, the manager make fun of them, they rinse the knife, sanitize it in dish, and they chop up mushrooms with it. I reported it to the health inspector and my car’s windshield happened to get busted when the camera didn’t work.

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is there any reasonable level of IP protection/DRM which may be employed by movie studios?

    Should all films have simultaneous worldwide cross-platform releases, never theater only? If not, it seems some kind of defenses on the high-quality digital files for theaters would be a rare case where DRM seems somewhat justifiable… assuming it’s robust (beyond mergers/closures of the provider), and consumers never have to think about it.

    Would love to hear arguments both for and against any protection schemes for any film ever.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Re: reasonable levels - You can have fail safe or fail secure. Those are two mutually exclusive options. Locking people out of content, whether it be consumers or a partner organization (like a theater) is the price of security (fail secure).

      There is no condition where mild DRM is valuable to anyone. For consumers it constitutes a hurdle to use of content they have purchased without hindering non-purchased copies from being reproduced and distributed. No DRM allows the latter; unbreakable DRM ensures the former will be substantially affected at some point.