• FederatedSaint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Like, I get your overall point, but the whiskey to wine comparison doesn’t quite work lol.

    For starters, you’d have to drink a LOT more wine comparatively, which doesn’t translate when going from ICE to electric.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It does, because the batteries for electric cars have a reliance on rare earth metals.

      Lol the downvotes are hilarious. We will not solve climate change with electric cars. Public transit in walkable communities with niche uses for cars and trucks are the only way forward.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          As seen in the Wikipedia article, sodium ion batteries also require rare earth metal anodes, or toxic materials like mercury which is also bad. Better than lithium ion, but still generally not great. The best option would be aluminum air batteries, which should be easily accessible and are extremely recyclable

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The battery tech is starting to move away from rare earth, with LFP not using cobalt and sodium-ion not using lithium. And in any case, emissions are by far our most pressing problem compared to issues with rare earth extraction.