Like when the creator does their spiel for whatever sponsor.

  • Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Untrustworthy. Real reviewers buy the product. If you are reliant on companies to send you product to review then you cannot be impartial.

    • valkyre09@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Just to be up front I was sent this product free of charge for review. No money has exchanged hands and the company doesn’t get to review my video before I upload. “

      So, if you write them a bad review are they going to send you one next time?

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If the company is worthless, has no integrity, or is an idiot, no. Blacklisting an independent reviewer for a negative review says to me a company relies on dishonest shills rather than their own quality. “You didn’t like that one? Here, try this one.” at least takes some integrity.

        Let’s use the example of power tools. A reviewer is sent a tool, doesn’t like it. Switch isn’t very good, too heavy, motor breaks. So he produces a bad review, recommends against it. A shit company tries to prevent this guy from talking about them again. A good company says “Hey, will you try our new and improved version?” A company that takes their Ls and even listens and responds to criticism is worth paying for.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I more meant if you require companies to send you goods to review for your business to work, then you can’t be impartial.

    • Bongles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      As long as I have seen a reviewer shit on a free product at some point, I’m fine with it. Otherwise I agree.