• DeadHorseX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m not a libertarian, I’m a social democrat.

      The last century has been a total and unmitigated disaster for Argentina. The two options Argentinians had in this election were:

      1. More of the same by the guy who oversaw inflation reaching 160% (100% chance of things getting worse)
      2. A total wild card (99.9% chance of things getting worse)

      Unsurprisingly, they went for the latter. I don’t think anti-libertarians get to gloat in this context, given it’s the Argentinian establishment which has overseen one of the most remarkable examples of total state-collapse and economic failure in modern history.

      • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        This makes a lot of sense if you pretend he didn’t say or promise anything during the campaign.

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The calculation shouldn’t be “chance of things getting worse”, but “expected value of how much worse it’ll get”.

      • ragica@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t actually know anything. But casually to me it looked like a choice between 160% chance of it getting worse and a 300% chance of getting worse. And it’s not very surprising at all in these circumstances many go for the latter for all sorts of reasons (and delusions). But I don’t actually know anything.

        • DeadHorseX@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          You should probably read at least a little about Argentina’s recent history before commenting then…

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago
        1. More of the same by the guy who oversaw inflation reaching 160% (100% chance of things getting worse)
        2. A total wild card (99.9% chance of things getting much worse)

        FTFY

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s bad math. Yes, if you put the same people in office. There’s nearly 100% chance that they will continue doing what they have been doing. Good or bad. But if you put a lunatic with a grudge against reality in office. Who is aligned, or would align himself with the people who caused the problem before. You have 150% chance that things will get worse.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes, it was a jab at the logic. Things can always get worse. Always. Change for the sake of change is a bad proposition. So now the people causing the problems before aren’t in direct control. They have a go between patsy. Poised to push awful social oppression openly that they’d likely only thought about in wet dreams. And a large chunk of misguided populous supporting it. Because “it’s different”.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s the key ideological problem with the book. Rand was right that people do not inherently owe anyone else the fruits of their labor, but wrong about who was holding the world on their shoulders. It wasn’t the handful of elite, but the masses without whom the elite would be living in caves and running from bears.

        Who is John Galt? We the people are.

        And yes, throughout history pretty much every authoritarian regime ultimately collapses or sends their country back decades in progress by not knowing that lesson.

        Yet it never seems to actually be learned.

    • Goferking0@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah it’s not that it’s libertarianism failing it’s just that idiots version of it failing

      What they’ll say when it fails or next time someone else tries to implement their ideals

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      After a century of Peronism, the current state of Argentina isn’t a case study about libertarianism. Quite the opposite.

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    From everything I’ve heard about the election in Argentina, it was the meeting of “Anything is better than this” and “it can always get worse.” The former won, and proved the latter correct.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          We had the same in the UK with Brexit and Boris. We assumed that because everything is shit, backing people looking to do drastic changes that experts agreed was horrific was worth it. It wasn’t, and now people are even poorer…

      • JustMy2c@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Kirchner and croneys did soooooo much damage and noone spoke up except milei

        Even if he is a moronic religious extremist, he’s still RIGHT about many things.

        And the people just wanna get rid of NARCO DICTADORS OF THE LEFT KIND.

        All in all, extremism isn’t good. It leads to dictators collaboration with drug lords and ruzzia/china

    • JustMy2c@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, the current policies are just getting reality and practice closer together.

      IRL their money was ALREADY devalued soooooo much, he didn’t do anything to change that, just adjusted it to reality.

      Subsidies on imported oil is CRAZY for a bankrupt country. YOU GUYS HAVE NOT UNDERSTOOD WHAT IT’S LIKE TO HAVE DECADES OF 100% OR MORE INFLATION PER YEAR.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 months ago

    Fuck around and find out. I’m so sorry for everyone who was duped by libertarians pretending they will do anything for regular people and not just the wealthy shareholders, everyone who was held back by economic sanctions in a war against ‘muh socialism’, and all those who saw the obvious coming but were dragged into it by the other rubes. This is going to suck. I hope the protests will work

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh joy. Skyrocketing rent combined with plummeting wages.

    This isn’t going to destroy their economy at all…

  • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    My conservative dad won’t stop harping on Venuzuela, I think he’s about to get a taste of his own medicine.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just wait till the bears start showing up.

    Libertarians never plan for the bears.

    Enjoy Reverse Wolverine, Argentina!

  • flathead@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    They are chanting against the IMF… why?, I thought…

    oh…

    BUENOS AIRES, Dec 9 (Reuters) - A U.S. delegation gave its support to Argentine President-elect Javier Milei over talks with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and developing its lithium sector during a meeting in Buenos Aires on Saturday, a White House official told Reuters.

    Juan Gonzalez, adviser to U.S. President Joe Biden and the National Security Council’s Western Hemisphere senior director, said the talks, a day ahead of Milei’s inauguration, were “very positive” and focused on the country’s embattled economy.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/us-offers-argentinas-milei-support-imf-lithium-white-house-adviser-2023-12-10/

    Ah yes! a moment of clarity. Carry on, then. As usual.