How the hell do you manage to get banned from dating apps?
There might be a link between the bans from dating apps and the “not been in a long-term relationship”…
Add another link to posting on 4chan. I’m sure they are just a SWELL.
I feel like everything except their age can be traced back to no education.
What is “a SWELL”?
Sock With Exposed Lead Lining.
I’m still confused.
Stagnant Water Enhanced Laser Level
There are plenty of otherwise normal, functional people on that website.
Who are banned on dating apps?
But they never post anything
You mean they are lurking moar.
I appreciate the throwback.
Nobody who is well adjusted would tolerate the virulent racism for very long.
That’s largely concentrated to certain boards. At least it was years ago when some of the interest boards were worth visiting.
For example, /tg/ is a haven of tranquility, compare to the cancerous cesspool that is /pol/. I’ve never needed any of the other boards, frankly.
Usually being verbally abusive toward “females”
Why female is “in quotes”?
It’s a derogatory when used as a noun.
Previous poster put it in quotes to show that OP probably used it that way.
It’s not derogatory when used as a noun, it’s derogatory when used in place of woman. Female is an acceptable noun to use when talking about something that does not identify as a woman. For example, a fish. Fish don’t identify as women, so there’s nothing wrong with calling them females.
Yup
Who says “females” in that context? Usually a very specific subset of people who have “never been in a relationship” and make it other people’s problem. Like, regular person would just say “women”, hence OP quoting
Ferengi
Incels referring to women as females and likely a real chauvinistic attitude
deleted by creator
It’s a Brave New World and I proudly welcome it.
“Hello bambinos”
My wife’s best friend has been banned a couple times and is waiting to appeal her tinder ban again.
Although often justifiable based on the ways these guys have acted/spoke to her, it’s usually because she’s super ruthless in her response. A guy got mad she wasn’t interested in just being a booth call after she said she’s there for dates too, said she was after a free meal (paying hadn’t come up yet, and she always pays for herself unless a guy insists) and so she tore into him. And she’s brutal. Another had ghosted her after rescheduling on the date twice and saying stuff came up and that he’s busy (days after the fact, no check in or nothing) and so she told him that’s some horse shit and that he’s a little bitch that needs to get his life in order if he’s gonna stand somebody up twice after begging for a second chance.
She definitely could be nicer sometimes, but from what I’ve read from her it’s no different than how I see a lot of dudes talk on there, I think those guys just got their feelings hurt more than standard tinder girls do.
So someone who can’t control their temper got banned. The system works.
deleted by creator
I can see why she’s single LMAO
I used to go to school with a lady that was perma banned from Tinder last year. My guess is she replied to creepy/perverted messages with enough hostility that they yeeted her straight off the platform.
In all honesty I’ve gotten banned from a couple. Turns out they don’t usually take account security super seriously. Stop using it for a bit, and suddenly it’s sending out obvious scam bait messages lol
Mental mal-adjustment
You can also get banned from dating apps for not using them the way the app wants you to. For example not messaging people back or not swiping right enough on tinder.
Source?
M’lady
I’ve literally been asking that question. A lot of people never get to know why they’re banned.
Match Group owns the biggest ones, and sometimes people seem to get banned from all of them at once.
But Google Play Store also disallows installing dating apps for some people. Very unclear why, because there’s no official word on them doing it.
Maybe it’s for legitimate reasons, but given these companies dominance, I find it disconcerning.
They shadowban you if you’re ugly.
oh no, the consequences of my inaction
Being banned from dating apps is probably consequences for their actions.
Lack of license and being an alcoholic is probably consequences as well.
Not having a driver’s license could be either.
This dude reads like a sociopath. The system works.
Seriously. You need to really try to get banned from a dating app, let alone apps plural.
I’m sure there are countless social or personal reasons for it, but kids having kids without being taught responsibility or how life works means you get a lot of unfortunate children growing up who were never taught about making plans and goals in life, nor are they provided resources to be successful past childhood when you’re just expected to exist and nobody gives a flying fuck about you.
What did I ever do to you?
Exist, jerk face
turns to dust
deleted by creator
Banned from dating apps?
probably said the N word too many times
I uploaded a single photo that showed my clothed body and my smile, but not my nose/eyes. DONE BLOCKED ZZZ
I told a lady I was not interested in a non attacking way (mentioning I was not over my ex yet and needed some more time) DONE BLOCKED ZZZ
Then go do some stuff that will improve your life?
Yes, step 1. Stop drinking. Step 2. Get a job, any job. The rest fall in to place.
OI! He doesn’t have a loisense to be lonely, git ‘im!!!
…wayne?
Methinks the last item on the list might be somehow affecting the others…but certainly life is just hell for this guy and there’s nothing that can be done but type about it
I didn’t know you even could be banned from dating apps
Hell, as always, is self made and fake.
It’s actually quite an impressive feat to fuck your life up that badly. This person has absolutely nothing going for them whatsoever.
Ooh, I have 5/9. Four more to go!
Edit: apparently I can’t read and count
I got some bad news for you, bud. There’s only 9 on that list.
10 if you count hell?
Ye I’m blind
Too many folks stuck in a boat like this nowadays :-(
If you’re getting banned from dating apps you might wanna take a look at yourself and what you’re saying or doing
If they don’t have a license that’s a problem that they made, if they don’t have a job that’s probably because they drink too much and are unreliable (that may also be why they don’t have a license) and if they are an alcoholic that’s probably their core problem.
All of anons issues are their own, it’s not society’s fault they’re in this situation. Although I am sure they would not agree.
Not having a license isn’t actually an issue; you can save a lot of money by not driving a car.
This guy is probably just depressed and the lack of sympathy and support from others is only exacerbating and perpetuating the problem. People like him need love and support from external sources to be able to heal their inner wounds and fix their problems.
Life stuff like what he’s listing is never the actual source of the problem.
You’ll suffer nicely for the sake of shareholder profits.
This person is not even among the unemployed reservation, so how is this about capitalism?
They have no value to capitalism other than raw, unskilled, undifferentiated labour and consumption. They are nothing but the grease that gets mashed into the gears of the machine.
I think humans are worth more than that, and OP’s framing.
Please read the post. It says no job, no education. Person likely has mental illnesses, this is not about economics. The situation is political, sure, but this is not the best place to unionise.
They are nothing but the grease that gets mashed into the gears of the machine.
Ok, poet.
Do you image that a comfortable existence for those that you assume are mentally ill isn’t gated behind economic decisions?
Who is talking about unions?
They have no value period. This is not one to defend.
People have no value beyond what the market dictates?
This baby is crawling in front of me? No value, no point in stepping around it - Guess I’ll stomp its skull into the pavement.
This is deeply unhinged, and you should be institutionalised before you kill people.
No, this banned from dating apps, which means at best misogynist, at worst rapist, trash of a 30-something year old man is worthless. Babies are precious, what on earth motivated you to make that comparison?
So someone’s worth is defined by their adherence to Tinder’s TOS? This is all you’re basing this assessment on?
Shall we put autists in camps for missing social cues and making people feel uncomfortable too?
Maybe they’re mysoginistic, maybe they’re a rapist… or maybe they’re awkward, and had shit opportunities/parents - you can’t know, and to rush to write them off like that seems pretty bloodthirsty.
As Voltaire once said: You’re either the hammer or the anvil.
The full quote is
You must be either the servant or the master, the hammer or the anvil.
Surely there was no reason to hide the argument that servants and masters are a necessity in advancement of the point you’re outsourcing to someone that died over 300 years ago in defence today’s economic structure?
We still heed the advices of Adam Smith, Henry George, Karl Marx, etc. What’s so different about an Enlightenment writer?
Noone was citing those figures, but Marx saw the industrial revolution, at least. We take what’s relevant, and dismiss what isn’t - implying Voltaire was smart, so we should uncritically agree with everything he wrote is unhinged.
Would you rather defend the necessity of the master/servant model, or concede that the argument you outsourced is irrelevant pre-industrial nonsense?
We don’t heed the works of Karl Marx though do we? Even if you are that way politically inclined it’s called Postmarxist now. Because Karl Marks was frankly insane.
It’s the same reason we don’t really pay much attention to anything that Sigmund Freud came up with. All of it has either being subsequently discredited, or was never really taken seriously to begin with.
Nice strawman argument but this guy is a loses loser. All the basement dwellers look down on him and say oh look at him he’s pathetic.
It’s not capitalism’s fault that this guy can’t get his life in order.
It literally doesn’t even matter; he’s looking for sympathy and support which he has the right to seek out regardless of who is responsible.
So you can choose to quibble over who should bear the blame for his problems or you can console him like you’re supposed to be doing.
They can’t deliver value in this system, so they have no worth, and should suffer and starve to death?
Access to socialised education and housing seems like it would give them the opportunity to be of more value to society, no?
I’m willing to bet he does have access to socialized education since every western has socialized education.
No education
This is Lemmy. Everything is capitalism’s fault.
How are shareholders making money off an alcoholic NEET? Apart from him buying the cheapest possible booze they can get their hands on, obviously.
They get labour at poverty rates under threat of homelessness and starvation, and a hungry mouth to create (limited) demand for goods.
