Unfounded claims about offshore wind threatening whales have surfaced as a flashpoint in the fight over the future of renewable energy.

In recent months, conservatives including former President Donald Trump have claimed construction of offshore wind turbines is killing the giant animals.

Scientists say there is no credible evidence linking offshore wind farms to whale deaths. But that hasn’t stopped conservative groups and ad hoc “not in my back yard”-style anti-development groups from making the connection.

The Associated Press sorts fact from fiction when it comes to whales and wind power as the rare North Atlantic right whale’s migration season gets underway.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    What a silly thing to say.

    I think you’d be hard pressed to find someone who doesn’t want to use less power.

    I suspect what you really mean is that you want to reduce power requirements by some authoritarian policy.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, there are many people who explicitly don’t want to use less power. They usually point towards a correlation between societal development and power usage, and imply that using less power would mean we’re sliding back.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I’ve only heard it in the negative. “Economists used to believe that economic progress was tied directly to increased energy use but this data from the last ten years shows otherwise”

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not a common position, but it definitely occurs. I’ve seen it on Lemmy a couple of times, and much more often on Hacker News.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      What I want is to save the world from overconsumption, and yes, that’s going to require governments rationing power and enforcing efficiency.

      Calling that “authoritarian” is nonsense, though. It doesn’t require the army going house to house and killing people with incandescent lightbulbs or something. Grow up.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          We can’t do that without an extremely exploitative supply chain that uses child slaves to mine for cobalt and lithium, that is built on an imperialist supply chain that subjugates nations under the boot-heel of the likes of the US and France, that releases massive amounts of CO2 and causes huge amounts of deforestation from mining and shipping and manufacturing and installing this “green” technology.

          We also can’t do that on a reasonable timeline that will prevent catastrophic warming. The majority of estimates put us past 2040.

          Also? You aren’t going to get rooftop solar to replace coal and gas without “authoritarian” measures like mandates and penalties.