• maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given all the different ways “active” is defined we may as well just collect all the meanings available.

    Mastodon and Twitter etc, for example, count logging on as active.

    While I can see the argument for voting, it is qualitatively different from posting/commenting. Knowing both, as well as log in numbers too might make sense. But muddying the waters is probably confusing … though it is interesting that any instance can define what it means by “active”.

    • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would say that voting isn’t actually different from posting/commenting. It’s a process whereby a user takes part in a discussion/topic/post. In an ideal world, everyone would post, but we shouldn’t act like active people who don’t feel like they have anything to say explicitly, aren’t here.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Totally agree. Even when two commenters are replying to one another, there is always another layer where they are also addressing everyone in the thread/community/instance/fediverse, which obviously includes lurkers.

        The votes shape everything about the platform, so ignoring the lurkers in the stats feels like it’s missing an important data point.