The Medical University of South Carolina initially said it wouldn’t be affected by a law banning use of state funds for treatment “furthering the gender transition” of children under 16. Months later, it cut off that care to all trans minors.

One Saturday morning in September 2022, Terrence Steyer, the dean of the College of Medicine at the Medical University of South Carolina, placed an urgent call to a student. Just a year prior, the medical student, Thomas Agostini, had won first place at a university-sponsored event for his graduate research on transgender pediatric patients. He also had been featured in a video on MUSC’s website highlighting resources that support the LGBTQ+ community.

Now, Agostini and his once-lauded study had set off a political firestorm. Conservative activists seized on one line in particular in the study’s summary — a parenthetical noting the youngest transgender patient to visit MUSC’s pediatric endocrinology clinic was 4 years old — and inaccurately claimed that children that young were prescribed hormones as part of a gender transition. Elon Musk amplified the false claim, tweeting, “Is it really true that four-year-olds are receiving hormone treatment?” That led federal and state lawmakers to frantically ask top MUSC leaders whether the public hospital was in fact helping young children medically transition. The hospital was not; its pediatric transgender patients did not receive hormone therapy before puberty, nor does it offer surgical options to minors.

  • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re not a doctor. There have been studies and there will be more.

    What about the ethical consideration of teens suffering and killing themselves because of gender dysphoria? Does that not matter?

    This isn’t some “nice to have” this is important medical treatment to save lives, improve quality of life, improve outcomes.

    Politicians have no fucking business denying healthcare to trans people.

    • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      The “they will die if they don’t get gender affirming care” narrative is so harmful. Women who should qualify for gender affirming care (eg, hair removal from PCOS-induced hirsutism) aren’t considered the same way. Do their feelings matter less? Are they really commiting suicide in large numbers because they do not have this treatment (perhaps it’s unaffordable because health insurance doesn’t cover it)?

      • Girru00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        LOL, PCOS hirsutism has available pharmacological and non- pharmacological treatments. What is your point here?