• sarmale@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems pretty obvious why they are doing all this, why they dont remove it from chrome store?

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      They probably don’t want all those people realizing they can install extensions manually, because then they’d need to actively scan for and block extension installations.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or realizing they can stick to an older Chrome version with V2 extensions that retain full capabilities…

        • bluefirex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That will stop working way sooner than you’d like. Freezing a browser isn’t tenable at all, not just for features websites are expecting but also security issues. There’s a reason every browser except Safari has a 6 weeks release cycle.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Web tech doesn’t evolve that fast. You can use a 1 year old version today without worrying about missing any website functionality.

            What you’re missing is features that the browser itself introduces, but in this case those would be anti-features so arguably Chrome will be getting worse.

            Then there’s of course the security vulnerabilities.

            Of course the whole discussion is moot since there’s a much simpler alternative, switching to another browser.