• NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope we also have a healthcare AI capable of researching the health impacts of 381,000 new materials before they just start showing up all over the world in unexpected ways.

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      We need to just make a materials white list. If it’s not already studied and proven safe then we don’t need to mass produce it. I

      I don’t give a fuck if it slows down innovation. We live in a globalized society, a new product can be created and spread across the globe before the health effects start to show.

      Think about leaded gasoline. It was a proprietary formulation with deliberately misleading advertising. Regulators failed to act when they knew there was the potential for harm, and then years pass and the globe is contaminated with a heavy metal that is dusted across everything and now just a part of our environment, and we are measurably dumber for it.

      And now the same thing has happened with plastics. It won’t be identical to lead but we will be dealing with the consequences for at least decades if not centuries.

      And the next dangerous material is just around the corner. Shit, it might already be here.

      White. List.

      • Bonehead@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the next dangerous material is just around the corner. Shit, it might already be here.

        It already is. It’s called PFAS, it’s everywhere, and we’re only just starting to learn how it affects us.

      • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, it’s not like we were surprised that lead is toxic or that plastic doesn’t break down, and we did it anyway. I’m guessing they would have gone on the whitelist.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m guessing these are mostly (hypothetical) new ceramics. It’s not like these are going to be totally unlike anything we’ve seen before.

  • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do they mean “found”? New formulas for materials? Does it have a recipe for making them? Does it know what properties they have?

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Linguists successfully make a list of every possible combination of letters up to 30 letters long! Research continues into the meaning of these new “words”

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it sounds like these haven’t actually been tested, and many would not be stable, so this is typical popsci overhyping something, and leaving out all the "but"s.

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or: “scientists develop new technology that makes a part of their work hundreds of times more effective”