return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1363arrow-down113cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1350arrow-down1external-linkReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoThat’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?
That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?