This is something on tvs and even PC monitors/speakers that’s left me a little confused. Sliders/incremental input are okay for basic settings adjustments, but if you know exactly what you want your settings at…Why isn’t there a direct number input option on more devices?

E.g. brightness: slider/increment or input number within [range].
Volume: slider/increment or input number within [range].

I was helping adjust a somewhat newer tv awhile back and it brought this back to mind.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    For most people an exact number is not necessary. Just move it up or down until it sounds right. The number that is displayed to the end user is usually pretty meaningless anyways, since 25 on one TV is not always the same as 25 on a different TV.

  • Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    All my TVs have a percentage next to the slider. You still have to slide the slider, rather than type in a number, if that’s what you’re referring to. I think the slider is just easier for a generic remote, unless the remote has a keypad or you’re using a phone app as a remote.

    • ALostInquirer@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      than type in a number, if that’s what you’re referring to.

      It is, and also don’t most generic remotes still have keypads? 🤨

      That’s the part that probably gets me the most here. You used to, and with certain services still, have to directly enter in a channel number to go to that channel…So the basic setup is all there, but…Pretty much exclusively used for channel navigation because ???

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they give the number then most people try to stick with increments of five so they’ve adopted a “stop when it looks good” ux methodology.

    It’s also cheaper because you don’t have to normalize and internationalize the numbers.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      normalize and internationalize the numbers

      Is this still a thing? I thought we had settled on Arabic numerals a few hundred years ago…

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see Chinese characters on Chinese tvs for numerical values so idk. They may just say “volume” for all I know.

      • Schmeckinger@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most people use Arabic numerals, but some cultures switch comma and points and some cultures put decimal seperator at different spots.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You have a TV with volume controls in the thousands, or that lets you adjust by tenths or smaller?

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to see this feature. People here are right that there’s probably not a huge need, but also seems like a relatively low effort feature to add.

  • 0x4E4F@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are used to sliders, I guess 🤷. Things used to be like that on old TVs, so it just never occured to anyone that people might like a direct value input instead of a slider.

    To be honest, I wouldn’t know what to do with a direct input. Sliders are much more logical for fine tuning. It would be a nice option, but I would probably never use it.