• vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They had a warrant from a judge for threats. A judge determined that it was a threat. Threatening someone is illegal.

    Nobody was arrested, they were questioned and police took the computers as evidence.

    Edit: Nice edit

    • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      So thats a no. Im in no way defending them just that untill ive seen these threats im hestant to condem them.

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, you said this:

        I dont think anyone shpuld be arrested for speach. But i can understand germanys reasons to do such things

        completely ignoring the article because you’ve already made up your mind the second you read “speech”, suggesting Germany would arrest people for some harmless stuff.

        Are you in favour of not getting investigated after you’ve threatened someone?

        • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          I still havnt seen these threats. And germany arrested 6million people for some harmless stuff so wouldnt put it past them.

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re making a fool of yourself just because you would never admit to a mistake.

            This got to be the most stupid comment I’ve read the entire year.

              • vxx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The mistake of only reading the headline and also misinterpreting it completely, making assumptions in your extremist worldview.

                • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ok can you pleasd try being a little less hostile so we can have a productive discussion. Difference in interpretation is called an opinion we are all entitled to one. I didnt just read the headline. And thinking that we shouldnt arrest people based on speach is an extremist world view didnt knwo that.

                  From my interpretation they celebrated a terrorist attack. Wrong yes, moraly corrupt yes, should it be illegal no. If u think celebrating a terrorist attack should be illegal then then the very top of the arrest list would be the US government. And hate speach which nobody can actualy provide to me so god knows what they actualy said.