Unions are the strongest in decades. Nearly a million Americans got double-digit raises as a result | CNN Business
www.cnn.com
Nearly 900,000 Americans sitting down to Thanksgiving dinner this week will have unions – and the double-digit pay increases they won – to thank.

Nearly 900,000 Americans sitting down to Thanksgiving dinner this week will have unions – and the double-digit pay increases they won – to thank.

That’s how many unionized workers have won immediate pay hikes of 10% or more in just the last year, according to an analysis by CNN.

And the pace of increases of that size have been picking up. More than 700,000 of those workers won pay hikes over the course of the last six months, and of that group, nearly 300,000 saw deals reached in just the last six weeks.

“I would say this is the best run of wage increases won by labor since the period right after the end of World War II,” said Art Wheaton, director of labor studies at Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations in Buffalo.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    612·
    1 year ago

    Strong unions make strong businesses.

    Now let’s pass some union reform laws and get rid of “right to work” on the federal level.

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    422·
    1 year ago

    Unions are getting paid because corporations have gigantic piles of cash lying around right now (because of record profits), and they were hoping to just keep it for themselves somehow

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.worldEnglish
      29·
      1 year ago

      They thought the words “economic headwinds” would really just make the workers go “ah ok, sure. Keep hoarding away”

  • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
    28·
    1 year ago

    It’s not enough. Not until everyone is paid what they’re actually worth will it ever be enough.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.comEnglish
    18·
    1 year ago

    Now imagine if we had some way to send people that could represent our needs to the government. If only we could house such a group of people near the seat of government so that they could petition our needs in the form of … I don’t know let’s call it a bill of writ and law.

    If only we could have something like that, too.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    12·
    1 year ago

    Not nearly enough. We need a lot more participation. That’s gonna help with the money in politics problem too. This is the solution used the last time inequality and its socioeconomic effects were at this level, and it worked for a while.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    102·
    1 year ago

    This thread talks about the new young Democrat mayor of Terre Haute, Indiana where I live. I do not like him at all for other reasons, which I go over in the thread, but I think unions are definitely a big part of why he got elected. Despite Terre Haute being a big union town, it went to Trump both times and the mayor was a Republican for years.

    I think a lot of union members are just fed up with Republicans and their anti-labor stances and we’ll see more of that in 2024.

  • bitwise@kbin.social
    82·
    1 year ago

    Maybe I’m becoming too cynical, but the raises these unions have been settling on don’t really cover inflation over the periods where they received no increase.
    These articles just feel like the media wings of these megacorps are trying to stroke our egos. “Yes, so much bargaining power!”

    I can’t find the article I’m thinking of where someone used a bunch of privately sourced data to peg the average annual inflation at 7%, but this article shows how economists don’t even agree on what metrics to measure for calculating inflation.

    https://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/consumerpriceindex.asp

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      41·
      1 year ago

      I can’t find the article I’m thinking of where someone used a bunch of privately sourced data to peg the average annual inflation at 7%

      This is definitely not accurate. 7% compounding inflation every year is significantly more purchasing power lost than anything we’ve seen.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        41·
        1 year ago

        So you’re probably wondering how it’s possible that the dollar supply has been expanding at over 7% for the past 52 years, but inflation has only been 3% on average. The answer is that CPI data is designed to underreport inflation.

        Yeah there’s so much wrong here that it’s difficult to know where to start. I guess maybe let’s start with, inflation isn’t determined by how many raw dollars are printed, and population rises aren’t being taken into effect, both of which will heavily change his end result.

        • novibe@lemmy.mlEnglish
          4·
          1 year ago

          Mfs still subscribe to inflation theory from 200 years ago smh…

          Money is printed in accordance to inflation, among other things, but it’s not the cause. Ffs. The US printed trillions during and after the 2008 crash and there was barely any inflation then.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            5·
            1 year ago

            Glad to see this here. The way some leftists are repeating libertarian talking points about inflation these days is disturbing.

            • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
              12·
              1 year ago

              It’s intuitive because it follows from personal experiences with money. Having read and seen information on this, perhaps what gave me the clearest intuition was Randall Wray’s intro to MMT lectures. Perhaps throwing one of the simplest ones at leftists spouting this stuff would work for them too.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          3·
          1 year ago

          Seriously someone thinks that inflation is equal to increase in money supply? 🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♀️

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      24·
      1 year ago

      Wages have kept up with inflation though, often exceeding it.

      Here a link for the minimum wage.

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/1065466/real-nominal-value-minimum-wage-us/

      The real problem is that wages have not tracked productivity growth. But unions will not be able to solve that, since a lot of workers haven’t actually gotten more productive.

      Most productivity improvements are capital intensive investments in technology. You won’t be able to capture much of those gains through labour bargaining.

      To really improve the economic standing of workers, we must distribute non-housing capital more equally among the whole population.

      Start taxing large capitals and put things like IRA’s and 401K’s on steroids to grow the capital of normal people.

  • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
    5·
    1 year ago

    It’s nice to celebrate the wins this year, but I think there were just as many warning bells.

    UAW, WGA, and SAG got thrown their bones, sure, but we also watched those huge multinational companies gleefully ignore them for huge spans of time. These massive companies can just fall back on their international components, knowing the company can go on indefinitely without them, and wait for the union to run out of money. Then when the union members are desperate, the company finally comes to the table with a fraction of what the union wanted at the start.

    This years events showed pretty clearly that strikes are not (always) the existential threat to the business that made organized labor so powerful in the past. I hope the movement is hearing that warning bell.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    1·
    1 year ago

    Remember that the raises are almost always barely playing catch-up with contemporaries. I’ve not seen a case where a union member of staff is making even the average pay for a given job function.