President says ‘the court misinterpreted the constitution’ as he announces intention to use another law for debt forgiveness

  • ndguardian@lemmy.studio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just had a crazy thought that likely would not pan out. So the Supreme Court said the executive branch can’t “transform” the loan. Apparently though the option was there to provide loans that, if used for a specific purpose, were partially or completely forgivable.

    Why not just issue equivalent loans, with the stipulation that they must be used for the student loans? If the disbursed amount is not used for student loans within X time period, they are not forgiven and accrue interest.

    It is not “transforming” the loan, and unlike the PPP loans there is a vested interest in making sure it is used for the right purpose. Granted, it could become a logistical nightmare to run it smoothly.

    • Midnitte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sounds like a novel legal idea, the problem is the Supreme Court would find some rationale for their foregone conclusions…

      Edit: I wonder if he could just make the mandatory payment $0…

      • NotMyOldRedditName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if they could just make payments $0 the next president could change it. For this to work the actual amount owed needs to be reduced somehow or its just kicking the can down the road.

    • strykerx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That could be an avenue. It would be kinda like PPPs but for student loans. But I could see a lot of people misusing them, similar to PPP