RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up1412arrow-down110cross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up1402arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square39linkfedilinkcross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoNot having kids affects how rich you are ?
minus-squareDizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoSo kids have négative value?
minus-squareDizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoDepending on who you ask, yes.
Not having kids affects how rich you are ?
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.