• Michigan Senate Democrats propose bills legalizing physician-assisted death for terminally ill patients
  • The concept, legalized in 10 states and Washington, D.C., remains controversial
  • Supporters say it gives terminally ill patients more autonomy. Critics argue it’s ‘not the compassionate answer’
    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And this is an important point.

      Without free healthcare, assisted suicide becomes an economic choice.

      Pull the plug doc I’m in pain is what we want. Not pull the plug doc, my family will never be able to pay these bills!

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be great, but there is no reason one should be dependent on the other.

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually, without free healthcare assisted suicide can be as much about economic incentives as will to live.

        I.e. wanting to die so your spouse doesn’t lose all their retirement paying your medical bills.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is just another form of suffering people shouldn’t be forced to live through if they do not want to.

          • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some would argue that since the ability to remove the suffering is possible, that we should do that instead of being happy a dystopian solution like assisted suicide be praised as an acceptable option. Suicide is already an option. Having it be assisted just gives them another way to milk one last drop of blood from a stone.

            • derf82@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t agree the ability to remove suffering exists on this world. Even free healthcare and universal basic income won’t do that.

              The world is already a dystopia. Forcing people to continue to suffer is the most dystopian to me. Not everyone can easily and especially painlessly end their own life.

              • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Removing entirety might be impossible, but it can certainly be lessened by large degrees.

                I’m not advocating against assisted suicide, people should be able to die peacefully and painlessly when they choose. I am saying that it shouldn’t be the solution to a broken system. Fix the systems so people don’t feel the need to off themselves just to get away from it.

                • derf82@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We’re never going to fix the system. And even if we could, I don’t think people should have to suffer waiting. That is the problem with saying “well, we need to fix x, y, and z first.” The people suffering have no control over x, y, and z.