• Umbrias@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a philosophical and semantic discussion and they have taken a side. If people could stop framing this as a scientific absolute that would be great.

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. Its a technicality. Yes we dont have free will. But just in the sense that we can decide according to our free will, just that all the factors forming that decision have already happended and would have happened any other way. So free will exists, but its just a very complex illusion.

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just depends on how you define free will, what you take from that definition, how you approach the randomness of quantum physics, and how you feel about the boundary conditions of the universe.

  • confluence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sapolsky is an incredible behavioral biologist. You can watch a whole course of his Stanford lectures for free on YouTube.