The human species has topped 8 billion, with longer lifespans offsetting fewer births, but world population growth continues a long-term trend of slowing down, the US Census Bureau said Thursday.

The bureau estimates that the global population exceeded the threshold on 26 September, though the agency said to take this precise date with a grain of salt.

The United Nations estimated the number was passed 10 months earlier, having declared 22 November 2022, the “Day of 8 Billion”, the Census Bureau pointed out in a statement.

The discrepancy is due to countries counting people differently — or not at all. Many lack systems to record births and deaths. Some of the most populous countries, such as India and Nigeria, haven’t conducted censuses in over a decade, according to the bureau.

While world population growth remains brisk, growing from 6 billion to 8 billion since the turn of the millennium, the rate has slowed since doubling between 1960 and 2000.

  • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Always good to remind people overpopulation is not a problem when I see news like this.

    Our consumption habits are much more detrimental to earth than how many of us there are (most of us live in poverty). As countries develop, the UN estimates the 12th billion human will never be born.

    • TaTTe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Poor 12th billion mother-to-be. She’ll push and push but the baby just won’t come out 😔

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Our consumption habits are much more detrimental to earth than how many of us there are (most of us live in poverty).

      The best way to reduce consumption is to not exist.

      • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The rules and ethics around who gets to exist or not exist are more complex than fucking not being aggressively destructive with the plentiful resource we have.

        If you put it on a graph of how many people it takes to sustain the society you want versus the impact it has on consumption, you’d see you can’t draw a line that makes sense with our current way of life. Cut too low and you don’t have enough people. Cut too high and you end up with the same problems you think are due to overpopulation. Run the numbers, find your ideal spot and tell us how much of all this is actually number of people.

        Consumption doesn’t scale exponentially or even linearly with population, it does for the most egregious industries that run the world today. The math doesn’t check out, dude. The only variable left is to change the way we consume. We have the economic and technological means to do it, with nothing but greed and cheating keeping us from it, to serve the few.

        This isn’t even about communism or socialism either, we are far far beyond what is necessary in terms of capitalistic gains, like very very far beyond. You’re afraid your way of life would change but it wouldn’t really, as the video you didn’t watch clearly states.

        And if that doesn’t make sense to you, then by all means “be the change you want to see in the world”.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          All your essay is unraveled by just taking a plane and looking down. In many biomes, humans have left no room for anything else besides ourselves.

          And if that doesn’t make sense to you, then by all means “be the change you want to see in the world”.

          Yeah, I’m doing just that, by not reproducing.

          • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, most of the earth’s real estate is taken up by industries for the purpose of consumption, not for housing.

    • Favrion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still think that less humans is better. Restrictive birth should be more common.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with this approach is evident in China right now, where they will experience a pure demographic catastrophe where the share of people in working age will go down significantly, meaning their economy will start contracting and people won’t be happy because this will directly affect their lifestyle.

        • beetus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          where the share of people in working age will go down significantly

          That’s happening in most developed nations, btw.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where in this video does it state that overpopulation is not a problem? The message the video is conveying, as I’ve interpreted it, is that the bleak, distopian vision of an overpopulated planet is not likely based on historical trends: as we develop as a society, the overall standard of living has improved, fertility rates reduce to a stable or even shrinking population, etc., etc.

      The video does not address the current state of our overpopulated planet, and the impact humans continue to have on animal populations, biomes or climate change. None of these things are likely to be easily reversed within even a few generations, and with the current trend, will likely only continue to get worse in our lifetimes.

      In my opinion, overpopulation is a problem today, and while it may reduce social inequalities for humans, reproductive rates cannot drop quickly enough to make a dent in the lasting impact our species is having on issues affecting the planet as a whole.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s fair, but my objection to having kids is more due to the current capitalist structure than carrying capacity of the planet.

      I don’t want to spend my own resources rearing another slave for billionaires.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is. Reduce the population to under 1b and consumption is not an issue anymore.

  • Additional_Prune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember when it was six billion. Whole lotta fuckin going on. I did my part to slow down the train; I’m childless. Elon thinks I shouldn’t get to vote.

    • PahdyGnome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t know that about Elon but it doesn’t surprise me. That man sure has some silly notions.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The human species has topped 8 billion, with longer lifespans offsetting fewer births, but world population growth continues a long-term trend of slowing down, the US Census Bureau said Thursday.

    The bureau estimates that the global population exceeded the threshold on 26 September, though the agency said to take this precise date with a grain of salt.

    The United Nations estimated the number was passed 10 months earlier, having declared 22 November 2022, the “Day of 8 Billion”, the Census Bureau pointed out in a statement.

    Some of the most populous countries, such as India and Nigeria, haven’t conducted censuses in over a decade, according to the bureau.

    The minimum number of such births necessary to replace both the father and mother for a neutral world population is 2.1, demographers say.

    Israel, Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea rank among countries with higher-than-replacement fertility rates of up to 5.


    The original article contains 422 words, the summary contains 148 words. Saved 65%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!