• Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Netanyahu: Hamas is a terrorist organization that wants to eliminate the Jewish nation

      Hamas: yeah he’s right

      • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why Nethanyahu funded them.

        All his investments paid off in this neat little casus belli.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          He allowed Hamas to be funded but it’s still horrific the hand he had in making this monster. He allowed Hamas to grow so it would fight those looking to negotiate toward a two-state solution.

          • Five@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think this is what @SlikPikker@lemmy.ca is talking about:

            For years, the various governments led by Benjamin Netanyahu took an approach that divided power between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank — bringing Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to his knees while making moves that propped up the Hamas terror group.

            The idea was to prevent Abbas — or anyone else in the Palestinian Authority’s West Bank government — from advancing toward the establishment of a Palestinian state.

            Thus, amid this bid to impair Abbas, Hamas was upgraded from a mere terror group to an organization with which Israel held indirect negotiations via Egypt, and one that was allowed to receive infusions of cash from abroad.

            Hamas was also included in discussions about increasing the number of work permits Israel granted to Gazan laborers, which kept money flowing into Gaza, meaning food for families and the ability to purchase basic products.

            Israeli officials said these permits, which allow Gazan laborers to earn higher salaries than they would in the enclave, were a powerful tool to help preserve calm.

            Toward the end of Netanyahu’s fifth government in 2021, approximately 2,000-3,000 work permits were issued to Gazans. This number climbed to 5,000 and, during the Bennett-Lapid government, rose sharply to 10,000.

            Since Netanyahu returned to power in January 2023, the number of work permits has soared to nearly 20,000.

            Additionally, since 2014, Netanyahu-led governments have practically turned a blind eye to the incendiary balloons and rocket fire from Gaza.

            Meanwhile, Israel has allowed suitcases holding millions in Qatari cash to enter Gaza through its crossings since 2018, in order to maintain its fragile ceasefire with the Hamas rulers of the Strip.

            Most of the time, Israeli policy was to treat the Palestinian Authority as a burden and Hamas as an asset. Far-right MK Bezalel Smotrich, now the finance minister in the hardline government and leader of the Religious Zionism party, said so himself in 2015.

            Excerpt from For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces by Tal Schneider and published by The Times of Israel.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Netanyahu does not state that killing of civilians is his goal, nor does IDF purposely do that. Imagine the amount of civilian deaths if it were actually IDF’s goal, as it is for Hamas.

          • DanL4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israeli military is not for volunteers, it’s for everyone. The top ranking generals and chiefs of staff were prominent against Netanyahu and this extremist incompetent government. They are also said that human rights activists that give a voice to solders that saw atrocious acts of the idf itself. This is not the norm, contrary to what the media would have you think. This, according to the top ranking Israeli ex officers, is how the idf should fix its wrongs.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They bombed a refugee camp. Twice.

            If I were a military commander in WW2 with the same technology we have today, and Hitler was out in the open at an elementary school graduation next to a preschool, I would not make that order. Instead, I’d mobilize intelligence agents to get there immediately and tail him, while moving my forces nearby.

            I find it hard to believe that Israeli military and intelligence agencies could not track him and wait. The IDF just cares more about their own skin than they do of Palestinian children.

            • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              It took the US 10 years to track down Bin Laden, all the while he was still communicating with cells. In your example that is a LOT of quality holocaust time for Hitler.

              There is no easy way out of the trolley problem of slippery genocidal targets popping up with a limited time window to execute.

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is an important distinction in my opinion. Does the IDF care if they kill palestinian civilians? No. But they aren’t actively trying to murder as many palestinian civilians as they can either.

        • Plopp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Being so incredibly nonchalant about killing civilians as the IDF is it’s almost an insignificant difference imo.

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            How should I know. What I do know however is that if the IDF wanted, they could kill many more Gazans.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              32
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Seriously look at their actions and decide for yourself whether or not they are going out of their way to kill civilians or whether they are so careless they kill anyone on their way

              The idea that the IDF would have to beat Gaza into a pulp so we can finally admit to ourselves that they don’t care about civilians is weak, not to mention a logical fallacy. This isn’t the indication to look for when war crimes happen. It’s the actions of the IDF themselves.

              Just look at all the times Israel told civilians to move to one place them bombed the shit out of the place.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Maybe they just want plausible deniability more than they want immediate genocide. It sure looks to me like that’s what they’re doing, and that it’s working.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because Hamas has used it as a base for decades…

            Just like every other piece of civilian infrastructure.

            You say Jabalia like it hasn’t been a city since the 40s. It’s not some tent city. It’s a legitimate city that has been around for decades, which Hamas only took control of after 2007.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes totally, that is enough excuse to shoot dead over a hundred people and wound hundreds more.

              Tents or not, you’re basically saying Israel bombed a crowded area and I’m afraid they are losing this one in the media. 😊

              It’s a refugee camp because people who live there are more victims of Israeli displacement.

              • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                26
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not a refugee camp at all. It’s a city that has existed for almost a century.

                You can cheer for Hamas. Your emojis don’t mean shit lol. Nobody else supports them. Even “the media” (you sound like my drug addicted religious dad here).

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  25
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  First, I didn’t cheer for Hamas.

                  Also, That area is still a refugee camp. You are confusing Jabalia city with the Jabalia refugee camp.. It’s okay to be wrong, you just have to admit it to yourself.

                  And the very fact that somehow bombing people taking refuge in a city rather than a refigee camp is something you needed to point out as though that changes anything … That’s very telling.

                  And lastly, Israel is losing the media war. 😊 It’s not sustainable to kill more people and get away with it, not when even holocaust historians are alarmed at the Israeli rhetoric and massacre it keeps committing on a daily basis.

                  • steventhedev@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Jabalia Refugee Camp was established in 1948.

                    It’s not a temporary housing measure. The buildings are all high-density multi-family dwellings constructed from reinforced concrete.

                    Calling it a refugee camp cheapens the word for people who are displaced from their homes and forced into temporary housing during a war.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly. Israel bombed a giant refugee camp. How is this helping Israel’s case?

                • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well, I, for one, hope that the IDF is finally fucking losing the popularity war. Until the US stops propping them up no matter what, they have no incentive to seriously work towards peace.

                  If they were fighting an actual war, then the leaders of Israel would be pulled into the ICC for war crimes.