• Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re designed in France but made in Taiwan as well, which makes it kinda shitty for it’s intended military purposes. If wars break out it’s kinda hard to get shipments from Taiwan to Europe considering the distance.

    I don’t understand why no country in Europe has built some kind of chip manufacturing capabilities at least for military and governmental purposes. There’s plenty of locations that would be excellent for it, and university is pretty accessable in general in the EU as well.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nobody apart from TSMC can replicate the manufacturing process for recent nodes. Anything sub-7nm, you need to use TSMC.

      So whilst somebody could build a silicon fabrication plant in Europe, it would be out-of-date before the first shovel hit the ground.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        With military/factory tech it doesn’t always have to be cutting edge chips tho. 7nm isn’t the most cutting edge either. There’s manufactories out there still running on x64 silicon using windows XP that aren’t connected to the internet, but it still works with their old factory hardware so they keep using it.

        Just from a security perspective, it doesn’t make sense the EU doesn’t really produce that type of tech locally, especially since the Dutch ASML is the only one of it’s kind in the first place - half the hardware requirements are already here. The educational resources required to train such a workforce are there. The location and money are there.

        If war did break out with say like the USA, EU is just automatically cut off, as Taiwan would probably side with USA to keep China off them since there’s not even a significant EU military presence there either. If Russia decides on doing a desperate full salvo, the logistics are cut off too.

        For consumer electronics, scientific instrumentation etc sure, relying on Taiwan would still make sense. But for infrastructure and defense, it’s just stupid to have critical supplies be nearly halfway around the world.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Silicon chips is a very globalised industry. The design software is USA/European. The lithographics and optics is European. The fabs and packaging is east Asia and a small amount in USA.

          Any two, and you can probably continue at somewhere behind the bleeding edge. If one area tries to do everything by themselves I think they’d currently fail.

    • maam@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Europe should defend Taiwan. Enough of this selfish euro mentality.

      • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You can do both. It is very dangerous to rely on military material half a planet away in times of possible war. Plus, Europe produces the equipment that is used to produce chips, so why not making them?

        • maam@feddit.ukOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Politicians have been shown to be spineless, they don’t do enough for Ukraine, the chip manufacturing is Taiwan’s nuclear weapons. It’s what keeps the world caring about them.

          • Lumisal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            It’s not about moving all chip manufacturing to Europe, just defense kind. Even for the sake of allies it would simply be a wise move to do so, as defending Taiwan would be easier if critical military tech wasn’t blockaded should a war break out.

            TSMC is still the best for producing the most advanced chips, but most military tech doesn’t need that level. Consumer tech would still make sense to produce there.

            PS: just occurred to me you’re also literally on a community called “buyeuropean”

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Taiwan is an independent country hugely dependent on the US and as said, far away. I wouldn’t count on them when shit hits the fan.

        • maam@feddit.ukOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yet democracies should be defended all across the globe. You’re right to doubt cowardly Trump.

          • Mihies@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Absolutely. Also international law should be defended. Another problem with Taiwan is that it’s status isn’t that clear.

            • maam@feddit.ukOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Hasn’t stopped Taipei from recognizing Israel though….

  • xploit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Any chance for an archive link? Only cookie options are to basically agree to data processing + reject garbage or subscribe…sounds like soft paywall to me.